Mayer Yael, Nimmon Laura, Weiss Aliza, Bulk Laura Yvonne, Battalova Alfiya, Krupa Terry, Jarus Tal
School of Therapy, Counseling and Human Development, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Israel; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Apr;147:106584. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106584. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
The underrepresentation of students and professionals with disabilities in health professions is well-documented in research, emphasizing the urgent need for greater inclusivity. Institutional structures often restrict disabled individuals from sharing their specialized knowledge on navigating disability, perpetuating epistemic injustice. Research emphasizes the importance of amplifying their voices to address inequities and restore epistemic justice.
This study explores the firsthand, experiential views of the challenges and supporting factors that disabled students and professionals face in the health professions education and practice. Participants provided advice for their disabled peers and non-disabled allies. The development of a critical disability epistemology amplifies underrepresented voices in the health field.
This qualitative study was guided by a constructivist approach, with data analysis informed by reflective thematic analysis.
A series of semi-structured interviews were conducted with 56 participants (27 students and 29 professionals) in nursing, medicine, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and social work. Participants were interviewed up to three times over the course of a year, resulting in a total of 124 interviews.
Two main categories were identified. Category one, advice for disabled students and professionals, includes the themes: (1) Negotiating disclosure processes to mobilize support, (2) Recognizing personal boundaries and strengths while actively seeking mentorship, and (3) Advocating for oneself and others. Category two, advice for non-disabled allies, encompasses the themes: (4) Fostering inclusivity through thoughtful language, education, and support, and (5) Actively promoting systemic change.
The findings enhance the epistemic agency of disabled individuals by utilizing community resources for collective knowledge production. They offer valuable guidance for educators, institutions, and policymakers, providing a roadmap for making health education programs and workplaces more inclusive and supportive for disabled individuals.
研究充分证明,残疾学生和专业人员在卫生专业领域的代表性不足,这凸显了提高包容性的迫切需求。机构结构常常限制残疾人士分享他们在应对残疾方面的专业知识,从而延续了认知不公。研究强调放大他们的声音以解决不平等问题并恢复认知公正的重要性。
本研究探讨残疾学生和专业人员在卫生专业教育与实践中所面临的挑战及支持因素的第一手经验观点。参与者为残疾同伴和非残疾盟友提供了建议。批判性残疾认识论的发展放大了卫生领域中代表性不足的声音。
本定性研究以建构主义方法为指导,数据分析采用反思性主题分析法。
对护理、医学、职业治疗、物理治疗和社会工作领域的56名参与者(27名学生和29名专业人员)进行了一系列半结构化访谈。在一年时间里,对参与者进行了多达三次的访谈,共进行了124次访谈。
确定了两个主要类别。第一类,给残疾学生和专业人员的建议,包括以下主题:(1)协商披露过程以获得支持,(2)认识个人界限和优势,同时积极寻求指导,(3)为自己和他人争取权益。第二类,给非残疾盟友的建议,包括以下主题:(4)通过审慎的语言、教育和支持促进包容性,(5)积极推动系统性变革。
研究结果通过利用社区资源进行集体知识生产,增强了残疾人士的认知能动性。它们为教育工作者、机构和政策制定者提供了宝贵的指导,为使健康教育项目和工作场所对残疾人士更具包容性和支持性提供了路线图。