Jørgensen Margarita Melnikova, Hamilton-Dutoit Stephen Jacques, Bramsen Jesper Bertram, Andersen Claus Lindbjerg, Holm Ida Elisabeth
Institute of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark; Department of Pathology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Institute of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lab Invest. 2025 Apr;105(4):104098. doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104098. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are used for high-throughput biomarker discovery and validation. Although TMAs have numerous advantages, they may not always be representative of the tissue heterogeneity present in whole tissue sections (WTS) leading to inadequate biomarker quantification. In this pilot study, we studied biomarker expression in 50 randomly selected colorectal cancers and 36 microsatellite unstable cases with or without BRAF variants. We used virtual TMAs to determine the minimum number of tissue cores needed to quantify biomarkers with the same precision as when using WTS. Paraffin sections were immunohistochemically stained for markers of T cells, B cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and macrophages. Digitized WTS were divided into tumor center (TC) and invasive margin regions. The minimum number of virtual TMA cores in each region was determined by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. Bland-Altman plots showed substantial disagreement between TMAs and WTS, being highest for 3 cores and decreasing with increasing core numbers. However, even when using 8 cores, the limits of agreement between TMA and WTS were wide, indicating a high degree of measuring uncertainty using TMAs. When using 3 or 4 cores, TMAs underestimated the expression of all the biomarkers in the TC; similarly, levels of macrophage markers in the TC, and levels of B cells in both the TC and the invasive margin remained considerably underestimated, even when using the maximum number of cores possible. However, 3 cores were sufficient to adequately classify biomarkers into categoric low and high expression groups. Microsatellite unstable tumors were characterized by high heterogeneity, which was further increased in the presence of BRAF variant(s). The virtual TMA technique is a useful method to establish the minimum number of cores to be included when constructing tumor TMAs for biomarker analysis. Our results emphasize the importance of TMA validation for a specific biomarker prior to conducting larger clinical studies.
组织微阵列(TMA)用于高通量生物标志物的发现和验证。尽管TMA有许多优点,但它们可能并不总是能代表全组织切片(WTS)中存在的组织异质性,从而导致生物标志物定量不足。在这项初步研究中,我们研究了50例随机选择的结直肠癌以及36例有或无BRAF变异的微卫星不稳定病例中的生物标志物表达情况。我们使用虚拟TMA来确定与使用WTS时具有相同精度地定量生物标志物所需的最少组织芯数量。石蜡切片进行免疫组织化学染色,以检测T细胞、B细胞、癌症相关成纤维细胞和巨噬细胞的标志物。将数字化的WTS分为肿瘤中心(TC)和浸润边缘区域。通过一致性界限为95%的Bland-Altman图确定每个区域中虚拟TMA芯的最少数量。Bland-Altman图显示TMA和WTS之间存在显著差异,3个芯时差异最大,且随着芯数量的增加而减小。然而,即使使用8个芯,TMA和WTS之间的一致性界限仍然很宽,表明使用TMA时测量不确定性程度较高。使用3或4个芯时,TMA低估了TC中所有生物标志物的表达;同样,即使使用尽可能多的芯,TC中巨噬细胞标志物的水平以及TC和浸润边缘中B细胞的水平仍然被大大低估。然而,3个芯足以将生物标志物充分分类为低表达和高表达类别组。微卫星不稳定肿瘤具有高度异质性,在存在BRAF变异时这种异质性进一步增加。虚拟TMA技术是一种有用的方法,可用于确定构建用于生物标志物分析的肿瘤TMA时要包含的最少芯数量。我们的结果强调了在进行更大规模临床研究之前对特定生物标志物进行TMA验证的重要性。