Quint Jennifer K, Dube Sabada, Carty Lucy, Yokota Renata, Bell Samira, Turtle Lance, Lu Yi, Evans Kathryn, Justo Nahila, Harley Michelle, Peters Jurgens, Talarico Carla, McNulty Richard, Goios Ana, Taylor Sylvia, Evans Rachael A
School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Medical Evidence, Vaccines & Immune Therapies, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
J Infect. 2025 Mar;90(3):106432. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106432. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
We aimed to characterise coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, mortality and healthcare utilisation in immunocompromised individuals in England during 2023, using INFORM (INvestigation oF cOvid-19 Risk among iMmunocompromised populations) study data.
Retrospective cohort study (ISRCTN53375662) using pseudonymised electronic health records of individuals aged ≥12 years from a random 25% sample of England's population. Over 1 January-31 December 2023, adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs; adjusted for age, sex, non-immunocompromising comorbidities) between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised individuals for COVID-19-related hospitalisation, death, and healthcare utilisation were estimated.
Immunocompromised individuals represented 4.0% of 12,056,685 individuals studied but accounted for 21.7% and 21.9% of COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, respectively. Risk of severe COVID-19 was elevated for immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised; aIRRs: 2.04, 95% CI 1.95-2.14 (COVID-19 hospitalisation); 1.69, 95% CI 1.53-1.87 (COVID-19 death). COVID-19 vaccination was more likely in immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised (≥4 doses 72.6% vs. 29.8%). The aIRRs for COVID-19-related general practitioner consultations and accident and emergency/day case visits were 2.26 (95% CI 2.22-2.29) and 3.02 (95% CI 2.84-3.20), respectively, for immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised.
Beyond three years since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, immunocompromised individuals remain disproportionately impacted from COVID-19 despite increased vaccination. These findings highlight a persistent need for additional COVID-19 interventions for immunocompromised populations.
我们旨在利用INFORM(免疫功能低下人群中2019冠状病毒病风险调查)研究数据,描述2023年英格兰免疫功能低下个体的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)严重程度、死亡率和医疗保健利用情况。
采用回顾性队列研究(ISRCTN53375662),使用来自英格兰25%随机抽样人群中年龄≥12岁个体的匿名电子健康记录。在2023年1月1日至12月31日期间,估计免疫功能低下个体与非免疫功能低下个体在COVID-19相关住院、死亡和医疗保健利用方面的调整发病率比(aIRRs;根据年龄、性别、非免疫功能低下合并症进行调整)。
免疫功能低下个体占所研究的12056685人的4.0%,但分别占COVID-19住院和死亡人数的21.7%和21.9%。与非免疫功能低下个体相比,免疫功能低下个体发生重症COVID-19的风险更高;aIRRs:2.04,95%置信区间1.95 - 2.14(COVID-19住院);1.69,95%置信区间1.53 - 1.87(COVID-19死亡)。与非免疫功能低下个体相比,免疫功能低下个体更有可能接种COVID-19疫苗(≥4剂:72.6%对29.8%)。免疫功能低下个体与非免疫功能低下个体在COVID-19相关全科医生咨询和急诊/日间病例就诊方面的aIRRs分别为2.26(95%置信区间2.22 - 2.29)和3.02(95%置信区间2.84 - 3.20)。
自COVID-19大流行开始三年多来,尽管疫苗接种增加,但免疫功能低下个体仍然受到COVID-19的不成比例影响。这些发现凸显了对免疫功能低下人群持续需要额外的COVID-19干预措施。