• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2013年至2019年中国乳腺癌患者保乳手术率的时空变化及其影响因素:一项基于登记处的研究

Spatial and temporal changes of breast-conserving surgery rates and its influential factors among Chinese patients with breast cancer from 2013 to 2019: a registry-based study.

作者信息

Lin Queran, Li Shunrong, Shang Tongrui, Gui Xiujuan, Zhu Liling, Yang Yuan, Zhong Ziliang, Wang Xiaoyu, Dai Lingyan, Zhao Jianli, Xu Yanjie, Chen Qianru, Yan Qing, Huang Xiaoliang, Hu Wei, Liang Zijian, Song Erwei, He Jianrong, Ye Pengpeng, Chen Kai

机构信息

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumour Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Breast Tumour Centre, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 2;15(1):e089188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089188.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089188
PMID:39894515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11792272/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to evaluate the spatial and temporal changes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates and influential factors of BCS in Guangdong Province, China.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This registry-based cohort study analysed the data of patients of all age groups, from the medical record cover page, which was mandatorily collected for inpatients by the Health Administrative Department of Guangdong Province, China. Patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, who underwent breast surgery between 2013 and 2019, were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We analysed the BCS rate in Guangdong Province between 2013 and 2019. Logistic regression was applied to investigate the association between patient-level influential factors and BCS, respectively. We used restricted cubic spline regression to model the non-linear association between hospital volume rank with BCS rate. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between city-level parameters with BCS rate of each city.

RESULTS

A total of 93 521 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, who underwent breast surgery, were included in the analyses. Among them, 10 949 (11.7%) had BCS, with the BCS rates increasing from 0.8% in 2013 to 19.2% in 2019. Patients who were older (vs <40 years, 40-49 years: adjusted OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.76; 50-59 years: 0.51, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.54; ≥60 years: 0.37, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.40) and married (vs unmarried, 0.64, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.70) were less likely to undergo BCS. Patients who were employed (vs unemployed, 1.58, 95% CI 1.49 to 1.68), received cross-city surgery (vs local surgery, 1.37, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.44), lived in a high-income city (vs low-income city, β=4.40, 95% CI 1.55 to 7.24) or in a city with a higher number of physicians per 100 000 residents (0.57, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.82) were more likely to receive BCS.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests a significant increase in BCS rates from 2013 to 2019 in Guangdong, China. Promotion of BCS is needed, particularly among older patients, lower-volume hospitals and economically underdeveloped areas. Healthcare system should be prepared to support the increased awareness of seeking BCS among younger patients with breast cancer by improving the availability of radiotherapy, multidisciplinary team and patients' education programme.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估中国广东省保乳手术(BCS)率的时空变化及BCS的影响因素。

设计、设置与参与者:这项基于登记的队列研究分析了所有年龄组患者的数据,数据来自中国广东省卫生行政部门强制收集的住院病历封面页。纳入了2013年至2019年间接受乳腺手术的非转移性乳腺癌患者。

主要结局与测量指标

我们分析了2013年至2019年广东省的BCS率。分别应用逻辑回归研究患者层面影响因素与BCS之间的关联。我们使用受限立方样条回归对医院手术量排名与BCS率之间的非线性关联进行建模。采用线性回归评估城市层面参数与各城市BCS率之间的关联。

结果

共有93521例接受乳腺手术的非转移性乳腺癌患者纳入分析。其中,10949例(11.7%)接受了BCS,BCS率从2013年的0.8%升至2019年的19.2%。年龄较大的患者(与<40岁相比,40 - 49岁:调整后OR 0.72,95%CI 0.68至0.76;50 - 59岁:0.51,95%CI 0.48至0.54;≥60岁:0.37,95%CI 0.35至0.40)以及已婚患者(与未婚相比,0.64,95%CI 0.59至0.70)接受BCS的可能性较小。就业患者(与失业相比,1.58,95%CI 1.49至1.68)、接受跨市手术的患者(与当地手术相比,1.37,95%CI 1.31至1.44)、居住在高收入城市的患者(与低收入城市相比,β = 4.40,95%CI 1.55至7.24)或居住在每10万居民中医生数量较多城市的患者(0.57,95%CI 0.31至0.82)接受BCS的可能性更大。

结论与意义

本研究表明,2013年至2019年中国广东省的BCS率显著上升。需要推广BCS,尤其是在老年患者、手术量较低的医院和经济欠发达地区。医疗保健系统应通过提高放疗的可及性、多学科团队和患者教育计划,做好准备以支持年轻乳腺癌患者对寻求BCS的认识提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5a/11792272/3f21814f3642/bmjopen-15-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5a/11792272/e1f6a79cb2cd/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5a/11792272/ce080176c1ad/bmjopen-15-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5a/11792272/3f21814f3642/bmjopen-15-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5a/11792272/e1f6a79cb2cd/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5a/11792272/ce080176c1ad/bmjopen-15-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c5a/11792272/3f21814f3642/bmjopen-15-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatial and temporal changes of breast-conserving surgery rates and its influential factors among Chinese patients with breast cancer from 2013 to 2019: a registry-based study.2013年至2019年中国乳腺癌患者保乳手术率的时空变化及其影响因素:一项基于登记处的研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 2;15(1):e089188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089188.
2
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.原发性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤整形保乳手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 29;10(10):CD013658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013658.pub2.
3
Association of Breast Conservation Surgery for Cancer With 90-Day Reoperation Rates in New York State.纽约州保乳手术治疗癌症与 90 天再次手术率的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jul 1;151(7):648-55. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5535.
4
Non-doctoral factors influencing the surgical choice of Chinese patients with breast cancer who were eligible for breast-conserving surgery.影响有保乳手术适应证的中国乳腺癌患者选择手术方式的非医学因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov 11;17(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1723-4.
5
Receipt of mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery (BCS) in New Zealand women with BCS-eligible breast cancer, 2010-2015: an observational study focusing on ethnic differences.新西兰保乳手术后(BCS)可手术乳腺癌女性在 2010-2015 年期间接受乳房切除术和辅助放疗的情况:一项关注种族差异的观察性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11248-9.
6
Explanatory factors for variation in the use of breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy in the Netherlands, 1990-2001.1990 - 2001年荷兰保乳手术和放疗使用情况差异的解释因素
Breast. 2007 Dec;16(6):606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
7
Re-excision and survival following breast conserving surgery in early stage breast cancer patients: a population-based study.早期乳腺癌患者保乳手术后的再次切除与生存情况:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2882-7.
8
Surgical options for Chinese patients with early invasive breast cancer: Data from the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Registry.中国早期浸润性乳腺癌患者的手术选择:来自香港乳腺癌登记处的数据。
Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):444-452. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Nationwide population-based study of trends and regional variation in breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.全国范围内基于人群的研究,探讨了乳腺癌保乳治疗的趋势和地域差异。
Br J Surg. 2018 Dec;105(13):1768-1777. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10951. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
10
Quantitative Biomarkers, Genomic Assays, and Demographics Associated with Breast-Conserving Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early-Stage, Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER-Negative Breast Cancer.新辅助治疗后早期激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性乳腺癌保乳手术相关的定量生物标志物、基因组检测及人口统计学因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8829-8842. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16160-5. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Disparities and Transitions of Treatment in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in China and the US, 2011 to 2021.中国和美国 2011 至 2021 年早期乳腺癌患者治疗差异和转变趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2321388. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21388.
2
Analysis of a Trend Reversal in US Lumpectomy Rates From 2005 Through 2017 Using 3 Nationwide Data Sets.分析 2005 年至 2017 年美国保乳手术率的趋势逆转,使用了 3 个全国性数据集。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Aug 1;157(8):702-711. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2065.
3
A Cross-Sectional Study of Breast Cancer Surgery and the Cost Based on Data From 77 Chinese 3A Hospitals in 2015.
基于2015年77家中国三级甲等医院数据的乳腺癌手术及成本横断面研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 26;12:857359. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.857359. eCollection 2022.
4
Long-term Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer After Breast Conservation vs Mastectomy and Reconstruction.保乳与乳房切除术及重建术后乳腺癌患者的长期生活质量。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):e220631. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0631. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
Socioeconomic and clinical factors affecting the proportion of breast conserving surgery in Chinese women with breast cancer.影响中国乳腺癌女性保乳手术比例的社会经济和临床因素。
Gland Surg. 2022 Feb;11(2):341-351. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-25.
6
Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants.中国和美国 2022 年癌症统计数据:概况、趋势和决定因素。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108.
7
The Public Health Insurance Coverage of Novel Targeted Anticancer Medicines in China-In Favor of Whom? A Retrospective Analysis of the Insurance Claim Data.中国新型靶向抗癌药物的公共医疗保险覆盖情况——惠及何人?基于保险理赔数据的回顾性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 21;12:778940. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.778940. eCollection 2021.
8
Implementation and Early Impacts of an Integrated Care Pilot Program in China: Case Study of County-level Integrated Health Organizations in Zhejiang Province.中国一项综合医疗试点项目的实施与早期影响:浙江省县级综合卫生机构案例研究
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Aug 30;21(3):7. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5605. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
9
Cost-effectiveness of different surgical treatment approaches for early breast cancer: a retrospective matched cohort study from China.不同外科治疗方法治疗早期乳腺癌的成本效果分析:来自中国的回顾性匹配队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07840-6.
10
A multi-center investigation of breast-conserving surgery based on data from the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS-005).一项基于中国乳腺外科协会数据(CSBrS - 005)的保乳手术多中心研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Nov 20;133(22):2660-2664. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001152.