撤稿声明：传统包皮环切术与包皮环切环术的伤口愈合率及伤口问题：一项荟萃分析
RETRACTION: Wound Healing Rates and Wound Problems of Conventional Circumcision Compared With Ring Circumcision: A Meta-Analysis.
出版信息
Int Wound J. 2025 Feb;22(2):e70204. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70204.
D. Wang, Z. Li, X. Chen, and H. Wang, "Wound Healing Rates and Wound Problems of Conventional Circumcision Compared With Ring Circumcision: A Meta-Analysis," International Wound Journal 20, no. 9 (2023): 3699-3707, https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14262. The above article, published online on 11 June 2023, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.
王迪、李泽、陈晓、王浩，“传统包皮环切术与环切吻合器包皮环切术的伤口愈合率及伤口问题：一项荟萃分析”，《国际伤口杂志》20卷，第9期（2023年）：3699 - 3707页，https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14262 。上述文章于2023年6月11日在线发表于威利在线图书馆（http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/），经期刊主编基思·哈丁教授与约翰·威利父子有限公司协商后已被撤回。在出版商进行调查后，各方得出结论，该文章仅基于受损的同行评审过程被接受。因此，编辑们决定撤回该文章。作者未对我们关于撤回的通知做出回应。
Zotero 插件