Hewish Alexandra, Dibley Michael J, Raihana Shahreen, Rahman Mohammad Masudur, Islam Sajia, El Arifeen Shams, Huda Tanvir
Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Arnold School of Public Health, The University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2025 Apr;30(4):283-291. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14092. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
Preterm birth (<37 weeks), low birth weight (2500 g), small-for-gestational-age (birth weight <10th percentile of a given reference), and large-for-gestational-age (birth weight >90th percentile of a given reference) are indicators of vulnerable infants and risk factors for neonatal mortality. We estimated the prevalence and risk of neonatal mortality associated with these phenotypes and their mutually exclusive phenotypes in rural Bangladesh.
We conducted a prospective cohort study in five rural districts of Bangladesh using data collected from births in the Shonjibon Trial from 2013 to 2015. We estimated the prevalence of preterm birth, low birth weight, small-for-gestational-age, and large-for-gestational-age infants, individually and for mutually exclusive phenotypes, using a combination of these phenotypes. Neonatal mortality associated with preterm birth, low birth weight, small-for-gestational-age, large-for-gestational-age, and mutually exclusive phenotypes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Poisson regression for adjusted relative risks (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
We included 24,314 live births in this study. The prevalence of preterm birth, low birth weight, small-for-gestational-age, and large-for-gestational-age was 26.2%, 22.9%, 41.7%, and 8.2%, respectively. The prevalence of babies born appropriate for gestational age, with term gestation (≥37 weeks) and normal birth weight (≥2500 g) was 33.3%. For individual phenotypes, the neonatal mortality risk was approximately 3-fold for preterm, low birth weight, and large-for-gestational-age newborns and 1.5-fold for small-for-gestational-age newborns compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age, term, and normal birth weight newborns. The risk of neonatal mortality for mutually exclusive phenotypes was highest in small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and low birth weight newborns (aRR = 6.3, 95% CI 4.1-9.6) relative to appropriate for gestational age, term, and normal birth weight newborns.
In rural Bangladesh, most infants are born with one or more vulnerable phenotypes associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality. Our findings highlight the value of categorising newborns using mutually exclusive vulnerable phenotypes and their neonatal mortality risks, which can be used to tailor interventions to improve survival.
早产(<37周)、低出生体重(<2500克)、小于胎龄儿(出生体重低于给定参考值的第10百分位数)和大于胎龄儿(出生体重高于给定参考值的第90百分位数)是脆弱婴儿的指标以及新生儿死亡的危险因素。我们估计了孟加拉国农村地区与这些表型及其互斥表型相关的新生儿死亡率和风险。
我们在孟加拉国五个农村地区开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,使用2013年至2015年绍吉本试验中收集的出生数据。我们分别估计了早产、低出生体重、小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿的患病率,以及互斥表型组合的患病率。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和泊松回归计算与早产、低出生体重、小于胎龄儿、大于胎龄儿以及互斥表型相关的新生儿死亡率,并得出调整后的相对风险(aRR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
本研究纳入了24314例活产儿。早产、低出生体重、小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿的患病率分别为26.2%、22.9%、41.7%和8.2%。出生时孕周合适、足月(≥37周)且出生体重正常(≥2500克)的婴儿患病率为33.3%。对于个体表型,与孕周合适、足月且出生体重正常的新生儿相比,早产、低出生体重和大于胎龄儿的新生儿死亡风险约为3倍,小于胎龄儿的新生儿死亡风险约为1.5倍。相对于孕周合适、足月且出生体重正常的新生儿,互斥表型的新生儿死亡风险在小于胎龄儿、早产和低出生体重新生儿中最高(aRR = 6.3,95% CI 4.1 - 9.6)。
在孟加拉国农村地区,大多数婴儿出生时具有一种或多种与新生儿死亡风险增加相关的脆弱表型。我们的研究结果突出了使用互斥的脆弱表型及其新生儿死亡风险对新生儿进行分类的价值,这可用于定制干预措施以提高生存率。