Perticarini Loris, Andriollo Luca, Rossi Stefano M P, Sangaletti Rudy, Benazzo Francesco
Section of Prosthetic Surgery with Robotics - Sports Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Hip Int. 2025 Sep;35(5):479-485. doi: 10.1177/11207000251315837. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
Bone loss represents a formidable challenge in hip revision surgery. Recent advances in revision implants and the use of new materials have diminished the need for cup-cages in addressing severe acetabular bone loss, which, however, may still be indicated in certain situations. The objectives of this study are to assess survival, functional outcomes, and reasons for the failure of managing severe acetabular bone loss with titanium cages and cemented cup.
57 patients treated with an acetabular cage and cemented cup for acetabular revision between January 2014 and July 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Inclusion criteria comprised cup loosening with bone loss greater than IIB according to Paprosky classification, and a follow-up of at least 60 months.
The average age at the time of surgery was 74.8 years (SD 10.7). The acetabular bone defect according to the Paprosky classification was: type II C in 10 patients (21.7%), type III A in 21 patients (45.7%) and type III B in 15 patients (32.6%). Pelvic discontinuity was present in 35 cases (76.1%). The average follow-up during the final assessment was 78.3 months (SD 14.9). The reoperation rate was 13% (6 patients) and the complications rate was 17.4%. The survivorship of the implant was 87% at final follow-up.At the final follow-up average HHS was 89.4 ± 13.4, average WOMAC 15.7 ± 17.2, average HOOS 81.3 ± 19 and average FJS-12 83.7 ± 17.2. At the final follow-up, 32 patients (80%) showed excellent or good outcomes (HHS >80).
In the presence of severe bone defects, acetabular reconstruction using titanium acetabular cages and cemented UHMWPE cups remains a valid treatment option. Specifically, this acetabular reconstruction system should be favoured for elderly or low-demand patients, with the possibility of using it safely even in patients with pelvic discontinuity.
