Gegoff Isabella, Tatasciore Monica, Bowden Vanessa K, Loft Shayne
The University of Western Australia, Australia.
Hum Factors. 2025 Aug;67(8):776-794. doi: 10.1177/00187208251318465. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
ObjectiveTo better understand automation transparency, we experimentally isolated the effects of additional information and decision recommendations on decision accuracy, decision time, perceived workload, trust, and system usability.BackgroundThe benefits of automation transparency are well documented. Previously, however, transparency (in the form of additional information) has been coupled with the provision of decision recommendations, potentially decreasing decision-maker agency and promoting automation bias. It may instead be more beneficial to provide additional information without decision recommendations to inform operators' unaided decision making.MethodsParticipants selected the optimal uninhabited vehicle (UV) to complete missions. Additional display information and decision recommendations were provided but were not always accurate. The level of additional information (no, medium, high) was manipulated between-subjects, and the provision of recommendations (absent, present) within-subjects.ResultsWhen decision recommendations were provided, participants made more accurate and faster decisions, and rated the UV system as more usable. However, recommendation provision reduced participants' ability to discriminate UV system information accuracy. Increased additional information led to faster decisions, lower perceived workload, and higher trust and usability ratings but only significantly improved decision (UV selection) accuracy when recommendations were provided.ConclusionIndividuals scrutinized additional information more when not provided decision recommendations, potentially indicating a higher expected value of processing that information. However, additional information only improved performance when accompanied by recommendations to support decisions.ApplicationIt is critical to understand the potential differential impact of, and interaction between, additional display information and decision recommendations to design effective transparent automated systems in the modern workplace.
目的
为了更好地理解自动化透明度,我们通过实验分离了额外信息和决策建议对决策准确性、决策时间、感知工作量、信任度和系统可用性的影响。
背景
自动化透明度的好处已有充分记录。然而,此前透明度(以额外信息的形式)一直与决策建议的提供相结合,这可能会降低决策者的自主性并助长自动化偏差。相反,在不提供决策建议的情况下提供额外信息可能更有利于指导操作员自主决策。
方法
参与者选择最优无人飞行器(UV)来完成任务。提供了额外的显示信息和决策建议,但并不总是准确的。额外信息的水平(无、中等、高)在受试者之间进行操纵,建议的提供(不存在、存在)在受试者内部进行操纵。
结果
当提供决策建议时,参与者做出的决策更准确、更快,并将UV系统评为更易用。然而,提供建议降低了参与者辨别UV系统信息准确性的能力。增加额外信息导致决策更快、感知工作量更低、信任度和可用性评级更高,但只有在提供建议时才显著提高了决策(UV选择)的准确性。
结论
在不提供决策建议时,个体对额外信息的审查更多,这可能表明处理该信息的预期价值更高。然而,额外信息只有在伴有支持决策的建议时才会提高绩效。
应用
了解额外显示信息和决策建议的潜在差异影响以及它们之间的相互作用,对于在现代工作场所设计有效的透明自动化系统至关重要。