Lu Wenxiao, Zhang Tongsheng, Xia Fengfei, Huang Xiangzhong, Gao Fulei
Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangyin Hospital affiliated to Nantong University, Jiangyin, China.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Jiangsu Hospital of Huocheng County, Huocheng, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 17;14:1511210. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1511210. eCollection 2024.
Currently, inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is treated by both transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, their relative efficacy and outcomes remain unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare TARE and TACE to evaluate their safety and efficacy in treating inoperable HCC patients.
Relevant studies were identified by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, and Wanfang databases. Pooled analyses were used to compare treatment response rates, complications, and overall survival (OS) outcomes between the TARE and TACE groups.
This analysis selected 8 studies comprising 1026 and 358 patients that respectively underwent TACE and TARE treatment. The results revealed that the TARE group had significantly higher pooled total response, disease control, and 1-year OS rates compared to the TACE group (P = 0.04, 0.003, and 0.02, respectively), with a corresponding increase in OS (P = 0.0002). Furthermore, rates of complications including fever and abdominal pain were also reduced in the TARE group (P = 0.006 and 0.02, respectively). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the pooled analyses of complete response rates, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, 3-year OS, or 5-year OS between these groups (P = 0.24, 0.69, 0.15, 0.73, and 0.38, respectively). Significant heterogeneity was detected for endpoints including fatigue, nausea/vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, OS duration, and 3-year OS ( = 89%, 82%, 72%, 90%, 96%, and 66%, respectively). All endpoints exhibited no significant risk of publication bias.
This study revealed that relative to TACE, TARE performed using Y can yield significantly higher treatment response rates and prolong HCC patient survival with fewer treatment-related side effects.The PRISMA guidelines were used to guide the execution and publication of this meta-analysis. The study is registered at INPLASY.COM (No. INPLASY202380017).
INPLASY.COM, identifier INPLASY202380017.
目前,不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)可通过经动脉放射性栓塞(TARE)和经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)进行治疗。然而,它们的相对疗效和结果仍不明确。这项荟萃分析旨在比较TARE和TACE,以评估它们在治疗不可切除HCC患者中的安全性和疗效。
通过检索科学网、PubMed和万方数据库来确定相关研究。采用汇总分析比较TARE组和TACE组之间的治疗反应率、并发症及总生存期(OS)结果。
该分析选取了8项研究,分别纳入1026例接受TACE治疗的患者和358例接受TARE治疗的患者。结果显示,与TACE组相比,TARE组的汇总总反应率、疾病控制率和1年OS率显著更高(P值分别为0.04、0.003和0.02),OS相应延长(P = 0.0002)。此外,TARE组的发热和腹痛等并发症发生率也有所降低(P值分别为0.006和0.02)。而且,这些组之间在完全缓解率、疲劳、恶心/呕吐、3年OS或5年OS的汇总分析中无显著差异(P值分别为0.24、0.69、0.15、0.73和0.38)。在包括疲劳、恶心/呕吐、发热、腹痛、OS持续时间和3年OS等终点指标中检测到显著异质性(I²分别为89%、82%、72%、90%、96%和66%)。所有终点指标均未显示出显著的发表偏倚风险。
本研究表明,相对于TACE,使用钇进行的TARE可产生显著更高的治疗反应率,延长HCC患者生存期,且治疗相关副作用更少。本荟萃分析的执行和发表遵循PRISMA指南。该研究已在INPLASY.COM注册(编号INPLASY202380017)。
INPLASY.COM,标识符INPLASY202380017。