Suppr超能文献

免疫疗法治疗局部晚期或转移性肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌的疗效与安全性:一项多中心回顾性研究

Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

作者信息

Yang Xiongwen, Xiao Yi, Zhou Yubin, Hu Hao, Deng Huiyin, Huang Jian, Liang Maoli, Yuan Zihao, Dong Longyan, Huang Shaohong

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, No. 83, Zhongshan East Road, Guiyang, Guizhou 550000, China.

NHC Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Immunological Diseases, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.

出版信息

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Jan 31;17:17588359251316099. doi: 10.1177/17588359251316099. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (pLELC) is a rare subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer that predominantly affects younger, non-smoking individuals in southern and southeast Asia, where Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) prevalence is high. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in pLELC, especially in second-line settings, remain inadequately explored.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, in improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced pLELC.

DESIGN

This was a multicenter retrospective study.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 252 patients with stage IIIB-IV pLELC treated across six centers. Patients received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both (chemoimmunotherapy). The primary outcomes measured were PFS and OS across different treatment regimens.

RESULTS

Chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved both PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone, in both first- and second-line settings. In first-line treatment, chemoimmunotherapy resulted in a median PFS of 17.6 months and OS of 26.1 months, compared to chemotherapy alone (PFS 8.7 months, OS 19.2 months). In the second-line setting, chemoimmunotherapy achieved a median PFS of 5.1 months and OS of 13.5 months, surpassing the outcomes with chemotherapy alone (PFS 3.3 months, OS 8.9 months). High baseline EBV-DNA levels (>2000 copies/mL) and low programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (<50%) were associated with poorer outcomes. In addition, patients with high baseline serum tumor markers (STMs) and a dynamic reduction of ⩽20% in STMs exhibited significantly worse PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that immunotherapy, particularly when combined with chemotherapy, offers significant survival benefits for patients with advanced pLELC. Baseline EBV-DNA levels, PD-L1 expression, and both baseline and dynamic STM changes serve as important predictors of treatment response, highlighting the need for personalized therapeutic approaches in this unique subtype of lung cancer.

摘要

背景

肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌(pLELC)是非小细胞肺癌的一种罕见亚型,主要影响南亚和东南亚地区较年轻的不吸烟个体,这些地区的爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)感染率较高。免疫疗法在pLELC中的疗效和安全性,尤其是在二线治疗中的情况,仍未得到充分探索。

目的

本研究旨在评估免疫疗法单独或联合化疗在改善晚期pLELC患者无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)方面的疗效。

设计

这是一项多中心回顾性研究。

方法

对六个中心治疗的252例IIIB-IV期pLELC患者进行回顾性分析。患者接受化疗、免疫疗法或两者联合(化疗免疫疗法)。测量的主要结局是不同治疗方案的PFS和OS。

结果

在一线和二线治疗中,与单纯化疗相比,化疗免疫疗法均显著改善了PFS和OS。在一线治疗中,化疗免疫疗法的中位PFS为17.6个月,OS为26.1个月,而单纯化疗的PFS为8.7个月,OS为19.2个月。在二线治疗中,化疗免疫疗法的中位PFS为5.1个月,OS为13.5个月,超过了单纯化疗的结果(PFS 3.3个月,OS 8.9个月)。高基线EBV-DNA水平(>2000拷贝/mL)和低程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达(<50%)与较差的结局相关。此外,基线血清肿瘤标志物(STM)水平高且STM动态下降≤20%的患者,其PFS和OS显著更差。

结论

该研究表明,免疫疗法,尤其是与化疗联合时,可为晚期pLELC患者带来显著的生存益处。基线EBV-DNA水平、PD-L1表达以及基线和动态STM变化是治疗反应的重要预测指标,凸显了在这种独特的肺癌亚型中采用个性化治疗方法的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/166a/11783502/7e36cf527087/10.1177_17588359251316099-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验