Dehnen Tobit, Nyaguthii Brendah, Cherono Wismer, Boogert Neeltje J, Farine Damien R
Centre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.
Department of Collective Behavior Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior Konstanz Germany.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jan 31;15(2):e70943. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70943. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Agonistic and affiliative interactions with group members dictate individual access to resources, and investment in competing for resources is often traded off with other needs. For example, reproductive investment can reduce body condition and, thereby, an individual's ability to win future agonistic interactions. However, group members may also alter their behaviour towards reproductive individuals, such as becoming more or less aggressive. Here, we investigated the social consequences of reproduction in female vulturine guineafowl , a plural breeder in which females disperse and are subordinate to males. We found opposing patterns for within- and between-sex dominance interactions experienced by females from before to after breeding. Specifically, breeding females became far less likely to win dominance interactions with non-breeding females after breeding than before breeding, but received considerably fewer male aggressions than non-breeding females after breeding. Despite a limited sample size, our study reveals that reproduction can have nuanced trade-offs with dominance and suggests that the study of dominance may benefit from explicitly considering variation in interaction rates as an additional factor affecting individuals.
与群体成员的争斗性和亲和性互动决定了个体获取资源的机会,而在争夺资源上的投入往往需要与其他需求进行权衡。例如,生殖投入会降低身体状况,从而削弱个体在未来争斗性互动中获胜的能力。然而,群体成员也可能改变对生殖个体的行为,比如变得更具攻击性或攻击性降低。在此,我们研究了雌性肉垂麦鸡繁殖的社会后果,肉垂麦鸡是一种多配偶繁殖者,雌性会分散且地位低于雄性。我们发现,繁殖前后雌性在性别内和性别间的优势互动呈现出相反的模式。具体而言,繁殖后的雌性与非繁殖雌性进行优势互动时获胜的可能性比繁殖前大大降低,但繁殖后受到雄性的攻击比非繁殖雌性少得多。尽管样本量有限,我们的研究表明繁殖在与优势地位的权衡上可能存在细微差别,并表明对优势地位的研究可能受益于明确将互动率的变化作为影响个体的另一个因素来考虑。