Walia Anika S, Xiao Roy, Hao Daphne T, Rathi Vinay K, Sethi Rosh K V, Gray Stacey T
Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Massachusetts Eye and Ear Boston Massachusetts USA.
OTO Open. 2025 Jan 31;9(1):e70086. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70086. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
While outpatient otolaryngology procedures have been increasingly performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), the cost differences compared to hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) remain unclear. Utilizing newly available data collected from Turquoise Health's Rate Sense as required under the Transparency in Coverage rule, we assess, in this cross-sectional analysis, the differences in negotiated facility fees between ASCs and HOPDs for 20 common otolaryngologic procedures. Analyzing data from 4613 ASCs and 2382 hospitals, we found significantly higher facility fees at HOPDs, with a median relative price difference of +146% ( < .0001). This may be explained by greater infrastructure costs and market power differences between facilities. Our findings suggest that further shifting outpatient otolaryngology procedures toward ASCs could yield substantial cost reductions across health care systems. Additional research is needed to ensure safe and cost-effective patient selection for ASCs.
虽然门诊耳鼻喉科手术越来越多地在门诊手术中心(ASC)进行,但与医院门诊部(HOPD)相比,成本差异仍不明确。根据《医保覆盖范围透明度规则》的要求,利用从Turquoise Health的费率感知中收集的最新可用数据,我们在这项横断面分析中评估了ASC和HOPD之间20种常见耳鼻喉科手术的协商设施费用差异。分析来自4613个ASC和2382家医院的数据,我们发现HOPD的设施费用显著更高,中位数相对价格差异为+146%(P<0.0001)。这可能是由于设施之间更高的基础设施成本和市场势力差异所致。我们的研究结果表明,将门诊耳鼻喉科手术进一步转向ASC可以在整个医疗系统中大幅降低成本。需要进行更多研究,以确保为ASC选择安全且具有成本效益的患者。