Suppr超能文献

在健康志愿者中比较ApTOLL静脉输注与静脉推注的安全性和耐受性的临床试验。

Clinical trial to compare safety and tolerability between intravenous infusion and bolus intravenous injection of ApTOLL in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Hernández-Jiménez Macarena, Martín-Vílchez Samuel, Mejía-Abril Gina, Roman Manuel, Luquero-Bueno Sergio, Piñeiro David, Ribó Marc, Abad-Santos Francisco, Ochoa Dolores

机构信息

AptaTargets S.L., Avda. Cardenal Herrera Oria 298, 28035 Madrid, Spain.

Neurovascular Research Unit, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2024 Dec 21;36(1):102435. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102435. eCollection 2025 Mar 11.

Abstract

ApTOLL, a new modulator of Toll-like receptor 4, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in healthy subjects and in stroke patients; however, the route of administration used so far (30 min infusion) can potentially be an issue in the acute stroke units where "time is brain." To safely reduce the time of administration in future clinical trials, a dose-ascending, open-label, phase I clinical trial was conducted in healthy subjects. The objective was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of ApTOLL when comparing intravenous infusion (30 min) vs. bolus intravenous injection (1-3 min). The study was divided into three periods: (1) volunteers received 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL as a slow intravenous infusion, (2) 0.1 mg/kg of ApTOLL was administered as a single bolus, and (3) subjects received 0.2 mg/kg as a single bolus injection. No adverse events related to ApTOLL administration at any dosing pattern were reported. Maximum concentration was detected at the end of the infusion/injection, and mean half-life was 9.5 h for both routes of administration. These results show that safety and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between intravenous infusion and bolus injection of ApTOLL, supporting a change of the route of administration for future clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05569720).

摘要

ApTOLL是一种新型Toll样受体4调节剂,已在健康受试者和中风患者中证明了安全性和有效性;然而,到目前为止所使用的给药途径(30分钟输注)在“时间就是大脑”的急性中风单元中可能会成为一个问题。为了在未来的临床试验中安全地缩短给药时间,在健康受试者中进行了一项剂量递增、开放标签的I期临床试验。目的是比较静脉输注(30分钟)与静脉推注(1 - 3分钟)时ApTOLL的安全性和药代动力学。该研究分为三个阶段:(1)志愿者接受0.1mg/kg的ApTOLL缓慢静脉输注,(2)给予0.1mg/kg的ApTOLL单次推注,(3)受试者接受0.2mg/kg单次推注。未报告任何给药方式下与ApTOLL给药相关的不良事件。在输注/注射结束时检测到最大浓度,两种给药途径的平均半衰期均为9.5小时。这些结果表明,ApTOLL静脉输注和推注的安全性和药代动力学特征具有可比性,支持在未来临床实践中改变给药途径(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05569720)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bec4/11786813/5ee3c08821c2/fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验