Suppr超能文献

两种教学技巧对医生知识与表现的影响。

The impact of two teaching techniques on physicians' knowledge and performance.

作者信息

Greenberg L W, Jewett L S

出版信息

J Med Educ. 1985 May;60(5):390-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198505000-00006.

Abstract

The purpose of the study reported here was to compare two teaching formats, the traditional lecture and the case presentation, to determine which technique is more effective in continuing medical education (CME). Effectiveness was measured by assessing pediatricians' cognitive knowledge utilizing preinstruction and postinstruction multiple-choice tests, the physicians' performances using simulated patients, and the physicians' office records on diagnoses and treatment plans. There were differences between the two teaching techniques in regard to their impact on physicians' knowledge and their performance with patients. Physicians attending case presentation sessions were more likely to increase their cognitive knowledge than physicians attending the lecture sessions, but retention of knowledge was only slightly higher for the case presentation group than the lecture group. More simulated mothers making visits to the offices of pediatricians who had been in the case presentation group reported feeling that the physicians' plans for their children were totally or partially appropriate than did mothers visiting pediatricians from the lecture group. There were few correlations between the physicians' cognitive knowledge and their performances. Based on the findings of the study, recommendations are suggested for use in planning CME.

摘要

本文所报告的研究目的是比较两种教学形式,即传统讲座和病例展示,以确定哪种技术在继续医学教育(CME)中更有效。有效性通过利用课前和课后多项选择题测试评估儿科医生的认知知识、使用模拟患者评估医生的表现以及医生关于诊断和治疗计划的办公室记录来衡量。两种教学技术在对医生知识的影响以及他们与患者的表现方面存在差异。参加病例展示课程的医生比参加讲座课程的医生更有可能增加他们的认知知识,但病例展示组的知识保留率仅略高于讲座组。与拜访参加讲座组儿科医生的母亲相比,更多拜访参加病例展示组儿科医生办公室的模拟母亲报告称,觉得医生为其孩子制定的计划完全或部分合适。医生的认知知识与其表现之间几乎没有相关性。基于该研究的结果,提出了在规划继续医学教育时使用的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验