• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习算法的回顾性研究的盆腔器官脱垂风险评估模型的开发与验证

Development and Validation of Risk Assessment Model for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Based on A Retrospective Study with Machine Learning Algorithms.

作者信息

Mei Ling, Gao Linbo, Wang Tao, Yang Dong, Chen Weixing, Niu Xiaoyu

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Center of Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06046-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-025-06046-9
PMID:39899085
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to develop and validate a clinically applicable risk assessment model for identifying women at a high risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) based on a retrospective practice.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients with and without POP between January 2019 and December 2021. Clinical data were collected and machine learning models were applied, such as multilayer perceptron, logistic regression, random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine and extreme gradient boosting. Two datasets were constructed, one comprising all variables and the other excluding physical examination variables. Two versions of the machine learning model were developed. One was for professional doctors, and the other was for community-health providers. The area under the curve (AUC) and its confidence interval (CI), accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the model's performance. The Shapley Additive Explanations method was used to visualize and interpret the model output.

RESULTS

A total of 16,416 women were recruited, with 8,314 and 8,102 in the POP and non-POP groups respectively. Eighty-seven variables were recorded. Among all candidate models, the RF model with 13 variables showed the best performance, with an AUC of 0.806 (95% CI 0.793-0.817), accuracy of 0.723, F1 of 0.731, sensitivity of 0.742, and specificity of 0.703. Excluding the physical examination variables, the RF model with 11 variables showed an AUC, accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.716, 0.652, 0.688, 0.757, and 0.545 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed a clinically applicable risk warning system that will help clinicians to identify women at a high risk of POP.

摘要

引言与假设

我们旨在基于一项回顾性实践,开发并验证一种临床适用的风险评估模型,以识别盆腔器官脱垂(POP)高危女性。

方法

本研究纳入了2019年1月至2021年12月期间患有和未患有POP的患者。收集临床数据并应用机器学习模型,如多层感知器、逻辑回归、随机森林(RF)、轻量级梯度提升机和极限梯度提升。构建了两个数据集,一个包含所有变量,另一个排除体格检查变量。开发了两个版本的机器学习模型。一个供专业医生使用,另一个供社区卫生服务提供者使用。计算曲线下面积(AUC)及其置信区间(CI)、准确率、F1分数、敏感性和特异性,以评估模型性能。使用Shapley值法对模型输出进行可视化和解释。

结果

共招募了16416名女性,POP组和非POP组分别有8314名和8102名。记录了87个变量。在所有候选模型中,包含13个变量的RF模型表现最佳,AUC为0.806(95%CI 0.793-0.817),准确率为0.723,F1为0.731,敏感性为0.742,特异性为0.703。排除体格检查变量后,包含11个变量的RF模型的AUC、准确率、F1分数、敏感性和特异性分别为0.716、0.652、0.688、0.757和0.545。

结论

我们构建了一个临床适用的风险预警系统,这将有助于临床医生识别POP高危女性。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Risk Assessment Model for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Based on A Retrospective Study with Machine Learning Algorithms.基于机器学习算法的回顾性研究的盆腔器官脱垂风险评估模型的开发与验证
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06046-9.
2
Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.机器学习模型在预测髋部骨折手术后输血可能性中的应用。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2643-2656. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02550-4. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
4
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
5
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
6
Prediction of 28-Day All-Cause Mortality in Heart Failure Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection Using Machine Learning Models: Evidence from the MIMIC-IV Database.使用机器学习模型预测艰难梭菌感染心力衰竭患者的28天全因死亡率:来自MIMIC-IV数据库的证据
Cardiology. 2025;150(2):133-144. doi: 10.1159/000540994. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
7
Prediction and feature selection of low birth weight using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测和选择低出生体重。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Oct 12;43(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00647-8.
8
Interpretable machine learning model to predict surgical difficulty in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.用于预测直肠癌腹腔镜切除手术难度的可解释机器学习模型。
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 6;14:1337219. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1337219. eCollection 2024.
9
Construction of a predictive model for radiation proctitis after radiotherapy for female pelvic tumors based on machine learning.基于机器学习构建女性盆腔肿瘤放疗后放射性直肠炎预测模型。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Aug 28;47(8):1065-1074. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.220353.
10
Application and interpretation of machine learning models in predicting the risk of severe obstructive sleep apnea in adults.机器学习模型在预测成人重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停风险中的应用与解读。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02331-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Feedback on "Comment on 'Development and Validation of Risk Assessment Model for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Based on A Retrospective Study with Machine Learning Algorithm'".关于《基于机器学习算法的回顾性研究对盆腔器官脱垂风险评估模型的开发与验证》的评论反馈
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06227-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of women with vaginal laxity: systematic review with meta-analysis.阴道松弛女性的治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Sex Med. 2024 Apr 30;21(5):430-442. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae028.
2
Anatomic Criterion for Clinically Relevant Apical Prolapse in Urogynecology Populations.泌尿妇科人群中临床相关的顶端脱垂的解剖学标准。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 Jul 26;29(11):860-4. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001383.
3
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following colpocleisis: A meta-analysis.经阴道阴道封闭术后盆腔器官脱垂复发的危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;164(3):848-856. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14999. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Management of female pelvic organ prolapse-Summary of the 2021 HAS guidelines.女性盆腔器官脱垂的管理——2021年澳大利亚卫生服务咨询委员会指南摘要
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023 Mar;52(3):102535. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102535. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
5
[Establishment and validation of prediction model of new-onset pelvic organ prolapse in early postpartum period].产后早期新发盆腔器官脱垂预测模型的建立与验证
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 25;57(1):32-38. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210919-00532.
6
Online prediction tool for female pelvic floor dysfunction: development and validation.女性盆底功能障碍在线预测工具:开发与验证。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Nov;33(11):3025-3033. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04985-7. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse.尿失禁和盆腔器官脱垂。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;64(2):314-320. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000615.
8
Genital Hiatus Size and the Development of Prolapse Among Parous Women.生殖道裂孔大小与经产妇脱垂的发生发展。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):e448-e452. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000960.
9
Immediate Postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Measures and 2-Year Risk of Prolapse Recurrence.即刻术后盆腔器官脱垂定量测量与 2 年复发风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):792-801. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004043.
10
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.