Lee Kyusup, Jung Ji-Hoon, Kwon Woojin, Kim Dae-Won, Park Mahn-Won, Choi Ik Jun, Lee Jae-Hwan, Yoon Yong Hoon, Lee Jang Hoon, Lee Sang Rok, Lee Pil Hyung, Lee Seung-Whan, Yoo Ki Dong, Yun Kyeong Ho, Lee Hyun-Jong, Her Sung-Ho
Cardiovascular Research Institute for Intractable Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Cardiology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 3;15(1):4034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88695-w.
Owing to limited data on the optimal timing of rotational atherectomy (RA), we sought to evaluate the clinical impact of the early application of the RA strategy. Consecutive patients with severe coronary artery calcification were enrolled, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using RA between January 2010 and October 2019 at 9 tertiary centers. Direct RA was defined as the early application of RA before the balloon was expanded to a size more than or equal to 2.0 mm. The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of technical failure or severe coronary dissection (type D, E, or F) during entire procedure. Of 581 lesions, 360 (62.0%) lesions underwent direct RA. The technical success rate was higher in the direct RA group than in the indirect RA group (97.5% vs. 93.7%, p = 0.021). The primary endpoint was more frequently observed in the indirect RA group than in the direct RA group (24.4% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of the primary endpoint was higher in the indirect RA group than in the direct RA group (odds ratio 2.512, 95% CI 1.547-4.078, p < 0.001). Early application of RA may reduce the incidences of in-hospital adverse events and procedure-related complications.
由于关于旋磨术(RA)最佳时机的数据有限,我们试图评估早期应用RA策略的临床影响。纳入了连续性的严重冠状动脉钙化患者,这些患者于2010年1月至2019年10月期间在9家三级中心接受了使用RA的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。直接RA被定义为在球囊扩张至大于或等于2.0毫米之前早期应用RA。主要终点是整个手术过程中技术失败或严重冠状动脉夹层(D型、E型或F型)的复合结局。在581个病变中,360个(62.0%)病变接受了直接RA。直接RA组的技术成功率高于间接RA组(97.5%对93.7%,p = 0.021)。间接RA组比直接RA组更频繁地观察到主要终点(24.4%对11.9%,p < 0.001)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,间接RA组主要终点的风险高于直接RA组(比值比2.512,95%置信区间1.547 - 4.078,p < 0.001)。早期应用RA可能会降低院内不良事件和手术相关并发症的发生率。