Tsega Tilahun Degu, Tsega Sintayehu Simie, Gebeyehu Asaye Alamneh, Yemata Getaneh Atikilt, Anteneh Rahel Mulatie, Yeshiwas Almaw Genet, Yirdaw Getasew, Yenew Chalachew, Enawgaw Anley Shiferaw, Ejigu Amare Genetu, Ahmed Ahmed Fentaw, Yigzaw Zeamanuel Anteneh, Mekonnen Berhanu Abebaw, Alemayehu Meron Asmamaw, Temesgen Abathun, Molla Abebaw, Mekonen Habitamu, Kassa Assefa Andargie, Bayeh Gashaw Melkie
Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia.
Department of Medical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10576-4.
Previous works of literatures on the viral load suppression rate of third line antiretroviral therapy in Africa has produced inconsistent and inconclusive results, with rates varying between 62% and 95%. This variability poses challenges for policymakers and healthcare providers in making informed decisions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the overall viral load suppression rate of third line antiretroviral therapy in Africa and to clarify the contradictory relationship between gender and viral load suppression, based on existing primary studies.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Henari, African Journals Online (AJOL), Web of science, and Google Scholar to access studies up to December 6, 2024. The PRISMA guideline, JBI, and Newcastle Ottawa quality assessment scale checklists were used. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochrane's Q and I statistics. Publication bias was checked using a funnel plot, Begg's and Egger's test, followed by the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Meta-regression, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. The odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to assess the association of gender with the viral load suppression rate in patients on third-line antiretroviral therapy. All analyses were conducted using Stata 18.
A total of 14 primary studies with a total sample size of 1791 were included. The pooled magnitude of the viral load suppression rate was 79.82% (95%CI: 75.75%, 83.90%). Around 75% of the included studies' heterogeneity were explained by country, study year, study settings and quality level of the study level variables. There was not statistically significant association of gender with viral load suppression rate of third line antiretroviral therapy.
The pooled magnitude of the viral load suppression rate was 79.82%. There was not statistically significant association of gender with viral load suppression rate of third line antiretroviral therapy. Therefore, to maintain and further improve the strong viral load suppression rates of TLARVT in Africa, it is essential to focus on appropriate regimen selection, patient counseling and switching, adherence support, and regular viral load testing. Future studies with larger sample sizes should explore the association between gender and viral load suppression to provide conclusive findings.
先前关于非洲三线抗逆转录病毒疗法病毒载量抑制率的文献研究结果并不一致且尚无定论,抑制率在62%至95%之间波动。这种变异性给政策制定者和医疗服务提供者做出明智决策带来了挑战。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在根据现有原始研究确定非洲三线抗逆转录病毒疗法的总体病毒载量抑制率,并阐明性别与病毒载量抑制之间的矛盾关系。
利用PubMed、Medline、Cochrane图书馆、Henari、非洲在线期刊(AJOL)、科学网和谷歌学术进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以获取截至2024年12月6日的研究。使用PRISMA指南、JBI和纽卡斯尔渥太华质量评估量表清单。采用Cochrane的Q和I统计量评估异质性。使用漏斗图、Begg检验和Egger检验检查发表偏倚,随后采用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型。还进行了Meta回归、亚组分析和敏感性分析。采用95%置信区间的比值比评估三线抗逆转录病毒治疗患者中性别与病毒载量抑制率的关联。所有分析均使用Stata 18进行。
共纳入14项原始研究,总样本量为1791。病毒载量抑制率的合并幅度为79.82%(95%CI:75.75%,83.90%)。纳入研究中约75%的异质性可由国家、研究年份、研究环境和研究水平变量的质量水平来解释。三线抗逆转录病毒疗法的病毒载量抑制率与性别之间无统计学显著关联。
病毒载量抑制率的合并幅度为79.82%。三线抗逆转录病毒疗法的病毒载量抑制率与性别之间无统计学显著关联。因此,为了维持并进一步提高非洲三线抗逆转录病毒疗法强大的病毒载量抑制率,必须注重合适治疗方案的选择、患者咨询与换药、依从性支持以及定期病毒载量检测。未来应开展更大样本量的研究,以探索性别与病毒载量抑制之间的关联,从而得出确凿的结论。