• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在社区成员和BDSM从业者样本中评估作为性虐待狂衡量标准的激动连续体量表。

Assessing the Agonistic Continuum Scale as a Measure of Sexual Sadism in a Sample of Community Members and BDSM Practitioners.

作者信息

Davidson Myles, Healey Jay

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Criminology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Sex Offending. 2024 Sep 10;19:e13829. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.13829. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.5964/sotrap.13829
PMID:39901972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11789441/
Abstract

Sexual sadism refers to a sexual preference for fantasies and behaviours involving the infliction of humiliation, degradation, and suffering onto others. The conceptualization of sexual sadism remains a contentious issue in the literature, with some believing sexual sadism is qualitatively distinct from other deviant sexual preferences, while others suggest it lies on a continuum of sexually aggressive behaviours. This second approach, known as the Agonistic Continuum, is a relatively novel conceptualization of sexual sadism. Its companion scale, The Agonistic Continuum Scale (TACS), was created to measure sexual sadism as a dimensional construct in both forensic and community samples. Despite several validation studies being conducted, the factor structure of the TACS has yet to be independently assessed. As such, the current study sought to assess the factorial validity and measurement invariance of the TACS in a community sample made up of primarily BDSM practitioners using a series of confirmatory factor analyses and latent profile analyses. 248 Canadian adults (65.3% females, 75.6% BDSM practitioners) completed a survey containing a demographic questionnaire and several measures of paraphilic interest including the TACS. Results of the factor analyses suggested a four-factor model provided the best fit to the data. However, incorporating sex as a multigroup analysis factor rendered this model a significantly worse fit. Further, latent profile analysis results supported the ability of the TACS to identify groups differing in sexual sadism severity but returned significantly different fit statistics across sex groups. Taken together, while the results of past studies were partially replicated, our findings call into question the appropriateness of the TACS in mixed-sex and non-community samples.

摘要

性施虐癖是指对涉及羞辱、贬低他人并使其遭受痛苦的幻想和行为有性偏好。性施虐癖的概念在文献中仍然是一个有争议的问题,一些人认为性施虐癖在性质上与其他异常性偏好不同,而另一些人则认为它处于性侵犯行为的连续体上。第二种方法,即所谓的“争斗连续体”,是对性施虐癖相对新颖的概念化。其配套量表,即争斗连续体量表(TACS),旨在将性施虐癖作为一个维度结构在法医和社区样本中进行测量。尽管已经进行了几项验证研究,但TACS的因子结构尚未得到独立评估。因此,本研究旨在通过一系列验证性因子分析和潜在剖面分析,评估TACS在主要由BDSM从业者组成的社区样本中的因子效度和测量不变性。248名加拿大成年人(65.3%为女性,75.6%为BDSM从业者)完成了一项调查,该调查包含一份人口统计学问卷和几项包括TACS在内的性偏好兴趣测量。因子分析结果表明,四因子模型对数据的拟合效果最佳。然而,将性别作为多组分析因子会使该模型的拟合效果显著变差。此外,潜在剖面分析结果支持TACS识别性施虐癖严重程度不同的群体的能力,但不同性别群体的拟合统计量差异显著。综上所述,虽然过去研究的结果部分得到了重复,但我们的研究结果对TACS在混合性别和非社区样本中的适用性提出了质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b880/11789441/7a63caacf1e9/sotrap-19-13829-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b880/11789441/7a63caacf1e9/sotrap-19-13829-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b880/11789441/7a63caacf1e9/sotrap-19-13829-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Agonistic Continuum Scale as a Measure of Sexual Sadism in a Sample of Community Members and BDSM Practitioners.在社区成员和BDSM从业者样本中评估作为性虐待狂衡量标准的激动连续体量表。
Sex Offending. 2024 Sep 10;19:e13829. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.13829. eCollection 2024.
2
An Examination of Empathy and Interpersonal Dominance in BDSM Practitioners.BDSM 实践者中的同理心和人际支配的考察。
J Sex Med. 2021 Mar;18(3):549-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.12.012. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
Fifty Shades of Belgian Gray: The Prevalence of BDSM-Related Fantasies and Activities in the General Population.比利时灰的五十度:一般人群中与BDSM相关幻想及活动的流行情况
J Sex Med. 2017 Sep;14(9):1152-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
4
The Index of Consensual Sexual Sadism (ICSS): Scale development, validation, measurement invariance, and nomological network comparisons with everyday sadism.合意性性施虐指数(ICSS):量表编制、验证、测量不变性以及与日常施虐的法则网络比较
Psychol Assess. 2025 Apr;37(4):148-160. doi: 10.1037/pas0001365. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
5
Are Role and Gender Related to Sexual Function and Satisfaction in Men and Women Practicing BDSM?BDSM 行为中,角色和性别与男女性功能和满意度有关吗?
J Sex Med. 2019 Mar;16(3):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
BDSM Proclivity Among College Students.大学生的 BDSM 倾向。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):3169-3181. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02303-w. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
7
Coercive Sexual Sadism: a Systematic Qualitative Review.强制性性施虐癖:系统的定性综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Dec 6;21(12):135. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1118-9.
8
Sadism in sexual offenders: evidence for dimensionality.性犯罪者的施虐癖:维度证据。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar;26(1):138-47. doi: 10.1037/a0034861. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
9
What's God Got to Do With It? The Relationship Between Religion, Sadism, and Masochism.这与上帝有何关系?宗教、施虐癖和受虐癖之间的关系。
Sex Offending. 2024 Sep 30;19:e13341. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.13341. eCollection 2024.
10
Sexual satisfaction and distress in sexual functioning in a sample of the BDSM community: a comparison study between BDSM and non-BDSM contexts.BDSM群体样本中性功能方面的性满意度与困扰:BDSM与非BDSM情境的比较研究
J Sex Med. 2015 Apr;12(4):1052-61. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12835. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Scoping Review of the Prevalence, Etiological, Psychological, and Interpersonal Factors Associated with BDSM.BDSM 相关的流行率、病因学、心理学和人际关系因素的系统范围综述。
J Sex Res. 2020 Jul;57(6):781-811. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1665619. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
2
Sadistic Offender or Sexual Sadism? Taxometric Evidence for a Dimensional Structure of Sexual Sadism.施虐癖罪犯还是性施虐?性施虐的维度结构的税项证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Feb;47(2):403-416. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1068-4. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
3
Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives.
G 因子模型中的异常结果:解释与替代方案。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):541-562. doi: 10.1037/met0000083. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
4
The Sadomasochism Checklist: A Tool for the Assessment of Sadomasochistic Behavior.《施虐受虐检查表:一种评估施虐受虐行为的工具》
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Apr;46(3):735-745. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0789-0. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
[Psychopathia sexualis: a clinical and forensic study].《性心理变态:一项临床与法医学研究》
Vertex. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(110):307-18.
6
The sexual responses of sexual sadists.性施虐癖者的性反应。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):739-53. doi: 10.1037/a0028714. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
7
Explaining the erectile responses of rapists to rape stories: the contributions of sexual activity, non-consent, and violence with injury.解释强奸犯对强奸故事的勃起反应:性活动、非自愿和伴有伤害的暴力的作用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Feb;41(1):221-9. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9940-8.
8
Sadomasochistically oriented behavior: diversity in practice and meaning.受虐癖导向的行为:实践与意义的多样性
Arch Sex Behav. 2001 Feb;30(1):1-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1026438422383.
9
Preferential rape in the theory of courtship disorder.求爱障碍理论中的偏好性强奸
Arch Sex Behav. 1998 Oct;27(5):433-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1018796312289.
10
Antisocial personality disorder, sexual sadism, malignant narcissism, and serial murder.反社会型人格障碍、性施虐癖、恶性自恋和连环谋杀。
J Forensic Sci. 1997 Jan;42(1):49-60.