Verma Anjali, Mohanty Sujata, Sharma Pankaj, Prakash Anjali, Kumar Rudra Deo
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, MAMC Complex, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, 110002 India.
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Hospital, New Delhi, 110002 India.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Feb;24(1):224-232. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01954-z. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
The study was performed to compare the effects of preoperative vascular mapping on the clinical outcome of axial nasolabial flap.
A total of 26 patients (29 flaps) were alternately divided into two groups using simple block randomization method. In Group I patients, the conventional axial flap was marked. In Group II, USG-guided flap was designed with the help of Color-Doppler ultrasound. Patients were assessed for a minimum of 6 months and the postoperative flap outcome was quantified using a self-validated composite scoring system. Other parameters of patient morbidity including length of hospital stay, resurgery for reconstruction of secondary defects, postoperative complications were also measured and compared.
The mean postoperative flap outcome score was significantly superior in Group II patients than Group I, at the beginning and at the conclusion of the study (intergroup -value at postoperative-1-week = .001; at postoperative-1-month = .044; at postoperative-3-month = .139; at postoperative-6-month = .007). Additionally, reconstruction defects with the conventional nasolabial flap were associated with greater morbidity as compared to Group II (intergroup comparison-hospital stay and duration = .001; complications = .115; Redo Surgery = .096).
Therefore, it can be concluded that flap selection based on known dominant perforators could be helpful in achieving favorable outcomes resulting in minimal postoperative morbidity while allowing complex surgical reconstructions.
本研究旨在比较术前血管造影对轴型鼻唇沟皮瓣临床效果的影响。
采用简单区组随机化方法将26例患者(29个皮瓣)交替分为两组。I组患者标记传统轴型皮瓣。II组在彩色多普勒超声引导下设计皮瓣。对患者进行至少6个月的评估,并使用自行验证的综合评分系统对术后皮瓣效果进行量化。还测量并比较了患者发病的其他参数,包括住院时间、二次缺损重建的再次手术、术后并发症。
在研究开始和结束时,II组患者的平均术后皮瓣效果评分显著优于I组(术后1周组间P值 = 0.001;术后1个月 = 0.044;术后3个月 = 0.139;术后6个月 = 0.007)。此外,与II组相比,传统鼻唇沟皮瓣重建缺损的发病率更高(组间比较 - 住院时间和时长 = 0.001;并发症 = 0.115;再次手术 = 0.096)。
因此,可以得出结论,基于已知优势穿支选择皮瓣有助于获得良好的效果,使术后发病率降至最低,同时允许进行复杂的手术重建。