Qiang Huiping, Wang Yue, Zhang Yao, Li Jingwen, Zhang Lincheng, Du Huawei, Ling Xuxinyi, Cao Shuhui, Zhou Yan, Zhong Runbo, Zhong Hua
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China.
Transl Oncol. 2025 Mar;53:102317. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102317. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
Approximately 30 % non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients carry KRAS mutations in western countries. First-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has been the standard therapeutic regimen for KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients. This population could also benefit from chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy. However, few studies has reported on head-to-head efficacy comparisons between these two treatment strategies.
We selected stage IV KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2017 to 2022. Their clinical baseline characteristics, first-line treatment strategy, whether combined TP53 or STK11 mutation, PD-L1 expression level, etc. were evaluated. The correlation between these factors and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
A total of 273 patients received first-line systematic therapy. The most common mutation was KRAS G12C (34.3 %). First-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy brought significant survival benefits (mPFS: 11.0 months vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.0003; mOS: 17.0 months vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.0002) compared with first-line chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy. Among the 203 patients who received first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, PD-L1 positive NSCLC patients responded better than PD-L1 negative patients (mPFS: 11.0 months vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.0004; mOS: 21.0 months vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.0005). ECOG PS score of 0-1 (HR=0.201, P = 0.001) and first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (HR=0.333, P = 0.009) were independent predictors of OS.
Compared with first-line chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy, first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has brought significant survival benefit to advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC patients, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.
在西方国家,约30%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者携带KRAS突变。一线化疗联合免疫疗法一直是KRAS突变型NSCLC患者的标准治疗方案。这一人群也可能从化疗联合抗血管生成疗法中获益。然而,很少有研究报道这两种治疗策略之间的直接疗效比较。
我们选择了2017年至2022年诊断的IV期KRAS突变型NSCLC患者。评估了他们的临床基线特征、一线治疗策略、是否合并TP53或STK11突变、PD-L1表达水平等。分析了这些因素与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)之间 的相关性。
共有273例患者接受了一线系统治疗。最常见的突变是KRAS G12C(34.3%)。与一线化疗联合抗血管生成疗法相比,一线化疗联合免疫疗法带来了显著的生存获益(中位PFS:11.0个月对4.0个月,P = 0.0003;中位OS:17.0个月对9.0个月,P = 0.0002)。在203例接受一线化疗联合免疫疗法的患者中,PD-L1阳性的NSCLC患者比PD-L1阴性患者反应更好(中位PFS:11.0个月对4.0个月,P = 0.0004;中位OS:21.0个月对11.0个月,P = 0.0005)。ECOG PS评分为0-1(HR = 0.201,P = 0.001)和一线化疗联合免疫疗法(HR = 0.333,P = 0.009)是OS的独立预测因素。
与一线化疗联合抗血管生成疗法相比,一线化疗联合免疫疗法给晚期KRAS突变型NSCLC患者带来了显著的生存获益,尤其是对于PD-L1阳性患者。