Suppr超能文献

≥65岁患者机器人辅助与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术短期结局的比较:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for patients ≥ 65 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

作者信息

Kossenas Konstantinos, Moutzouri Olga, Georgopoulos Filippos

机构信息

Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, University of Nicosia Medical School, 21 Ilia Papakyriakou, 2414 Engomi, P.O. Box 24005, 1700, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Head of Interventional Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Al Zahra Hospital, Dubai, UAE.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 4;19(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02222-7.

Abstract

Robotic right colectomy (RRC) has been researched and compared in the past to the laparoscopic approach (LRC). However, it remains unclear whether RRC outperforms LRC in patients aged 65 or older with colon cancer or adenoma. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the short-term outcomes of RRC to LRC in this particular age group. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for related literature. Studies and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Inverse variances weighted mean differences (WMD) with random effects model were used for continuous values, and odds ratios (OR) with random effects model using the Mantel-Haenszel's formula were used for dichotomous values. Heterogeneity using Higgins I and p values were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was performed for operative duration and number of harvested lymph nodes. In total 382 patients, 157 in RRC and 225 in LRC, were included in this study. A statistically significant increase of 43.91 min [95%CI: 19.61, 68.22], P = 0.001, was observed regarding operative duration in the RRC group, compared to LRC, but with high heterogeneity, I = 89%. However, a statistically significant decrease of 42% [OR = 0.58 (0.34, 0.98), P = 0.04, I=2%] was observed with regard to overall complications in RRC compared to LRC. Non-significant differences between the two approaches were observed in the number of harvested lymph nodes [WMD = 0.44 (95%CI: -3.94, 4.82), P = 0.85, I = 52%], wound infections [OR = 0.63 (95%CI: 0.11, 3.52), P = 0.60, I = 13%], rate of ileus [OR = 0.29 (95%CI: 0.08, 1.00), P = 0.05, I = 0%], length of hospitalization [WMD = 0.18 (95%CI: - 0.74, 1.11), P = 0.70, I = 0%], and anastomotic leakage [OR = 0.52 (95%CI: 0.09, 3.11), P = 0.47, I = 0%]. The results of the operative duration and number of harvested lymph nodes remained statistically significant and non-significant, respectively, after sensitivity analysis. Robotic right colectomy appears to require a longer operative duration, but possibly offers lower rates of overall complications, compared to laparoscopic right colectomy in patients ≥ 65 years of age. Due to the lack of studies identified in the literature, and the ones included being non-randomized, no solid conclusions can be drawn and cautious interpretation of the results is advised. Future studies are necessary to further examine both short- and long-term outcomes. Prospero registration: CRD42024603354.

摘要

过去曾对机器人辅助右半结肠切除术(RRC)与腹腔镜手术(LRC)进行过研究和比较。然而,对于65岁及以上患有结肠癌或腺瘤的患者,RRC是否优于LRC仍不清楚。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较该特定年龄组中RRC与LRC的短期结局。检索了PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆的相关文献。由两名独立的评审员提取研究和数据。连续变量采用随机效应模型的逆方差加权均数差(WMD),二分变量采用随机效应模型的比值比(OR),使用Mantel-Haenszel公式计算。计算使用Higgins I和p值的异质性。对手术时间和收获的淋巴结数量进行了敏感性分析。本研究共纳入382例患者,其中RRC组157例,LRC组225例。与LRC组相比,RRC组手术时间在统计学上显著增加43.91分钟[95%CI:19.61,68.22],P = 0.001,但异质性较高,I = 89%。然而,与LRC组相比,RRC组总体并发症在统计学上显著降低42%[OR = 0.58(0.34,0.98),P = 0.04,I = 2%]。两种手术方式在收获的淋巴结数量[WMD = 0.44(95%CI:-3.94,4.82),P = 0.85,I = 52%]、伤口感染[OR = 0.63(95%CI:0.11,3.52),P = 0.60,I = 13%]、肠梗阻发生率[OR = 0.29(95%CI:0.08,1.00),P = 0.05,I = 0%]、住院时间[WMD = 0.18(95%CI:-0.74,1.11),P = 0.70,I = 0%]和吻合口漏[OR = 0.52(95%CI:0.09,3.11),P = 0.47,I = 0%]方面未观察到显著差异。敏感性分析后,手术时间和收获的淋巴结数量的结果分别仍具有统计学显著性和无显著性。与65岁及以上患者的腹腔镜右半结肠切除术相比,机器人辅助右半结肠切除术似乎需要更长的手术时间,但总体并发症发生率可能更低。由于文献中未发现随机对照研究,且纳入的研究均为非随机研究,因此无法得出确凿结论,建议谨慎解释结果。未来有必要进行进一步研究,以进一步考察短期和长期结局。Prospero注册号:CRD42024603354。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验