• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性粒单核细胞白血病进展的克隆动力学:配对样本比较

Clonal dynamics of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia progression: paired-sample comparison.

作者信息

Kao Hsiao-Wen, Kuo Ming-Chung, Ou Che-Wei, Huang Ting-Yu, Chang Hung, Lin Tung-Liang, Hung Yu-Shin, Wu Jin-Hou, Shih Lee-Yung

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Pathol. 2025 Apr;265(4):437-447. doi: 10.1002/path.6396. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1002/path.6396
PMID:39905935
Abstract

This study investigated the clonal evolution of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) by next-generation sequencing and pyrosequencing for variant allele frequency (VAF) of gene mutations and SNP microarray for copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in 38 paired samples from CMML/sAML patients of Taiwanese origin. The median interval between CMML and sAML samples collection was 14.9 months (1.0-89.6). RUNX1 (57%), TET2 (46%), SRSF2 (37%), and ASXL1 (28%) mutations were frequent at CMML diagnosis. Baseline VAF in epigenetic regulator genes was high (>35%) in 83% of mutational events at the CMML phase, remained stable in 78% (VAF changes <10%), and increased in 20% (increased VAF > 10%) during progression to sAML. Transcription factor genes showed high VAF (>35%) in 51% at the CMML phase, and stable VAF in 60% during progression. VAF of spliceosome genes was high (>35%) in 70% at CMML phase, and stable in 61% during progression. Activated signaling genes exhibited acquisition or loss during progression. TET2 mutations were often founding clones, and SRSF2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, or spliceosome genes also acted as ancestral mutations. RUNX1 mutations were typically later events and occasionally ancestral hits or germline mutations. Acquisition of cytogenetic changes, signaling pathways genes (PTPN11, FLT3, NRAS, CBL), or AML-defined genes (NPM1, CEBPA, CBFB::MYH11) by linear or branching evolution occurred during sAML progression. CN-LOH was noted in EZH2, CBL, TET2, and DNMT3A genes. CEBPA mutation and concurrent biallelic TET2 with NRAS mutations at CMML diagnosis were risk factors for time to AML progression and overall survival. A characteristic ASXL1/RUNX1/Spliceosome/signaling genetic profile was associated with monocyte counts of 0.5-1.0 × 10/l. This study highlights the complexity and heterogeneity of dynamic changes in clonal architecture during CMML progression, emphasizing its importance in pathogenesis, phenotype, risk stratification, and therapeutic strategy. © 2025 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

摘要

本研究通过下一代测序和焦磷酸测序检测基因突变的变异等位基因频率(VAF),并利用单核苷酸多态性微阵列检测杂合性拷贝中性缺失(CN-LOH),对38例源自台湾的慢性粒单核细胞白血病(CMML)进展为继发性急性髓系白血病(sAML)的配对样本进行研究。CMML和sAML样本采集的中位间隔时间为14.9个月(1.0 - 89.6个月)。CMML诊断时,RUNX1(57%)、TET2(46%)、SRSF2(37%)和ASXL1(28%)突变较为常见。在CMML阶段,83%的突变事件中表观遗传调节基因的基线VAF较高(>35%),在进展为sAML期间,78%的VAF保持稳定(VAF变化<10%),20%的VAF升高(VAF升高>10%)。转录因子基因在CMML阶段51%的样本中VAF较高(>35%),进展过程中60%的VAF保持稳定。剪接体基因在CMML阶段70%的样本中VAF较高(>35%),进展过程中61%保持稳定。激活的信号基因在进展过程中出现获得或缺失。TET2突变通常是起始克隆,SRSF2、ASXL1、DNMT3A、EZH2或剪接体基因也可作为始祖突变。RUNX1突变通常是较晚发生的事件,偶尔是始祖突变或种系突变。在sAML进展过程中,通过线性或分支进化获得了细胞遗传学改变、信号通路基因(PTPN11、FLT3、NRAS、CBL)或AML定义基因(NPM1、CEBPA、CBFB::MYH11)。在EZH2、CBL、TET2和DNMT3A基因中发现了CN-LOH。CMML诊断时CEBPA突变以及同时存在的双等位基因TET2与NRAS突变是AML进展时间和总生存的危险因素。一种特征性的ASXL1/RUNX1/剪接体/信号基因谱与单核细胞计数0.5 - 1.0×10⁹/L相关。本研究突出了CMML进展过程中克隆结构动态变化的复杂性和异质性,强调了其在发病机制、表型、风险分层和治疗策略中的重要性。© 2025英国和爱尔兰病理学会

相似文献

1
Clonal dynamics of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia progression: paired-sample comparison.慢性粒单核细胞白血病进展的克隆动力学:配对样本比较
J Pathol. 2025 Apr;265(4):437-447. doi: 10.1002/path.6396. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Mutational landscape of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in Chinese patients.中国慢性粒单核细胞白血病患者的突变图谱
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2022 May 24;11(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40164-022-00284-z.
3
Impact of the variant allele frequency of ASXL1, DNMT3A, JAK2, TET2, TP53, and NPM1 on the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.ASXL1、DNMT3A、JAK2、TET2、TP53 和 NPM1 变异等位基因频率对新发急性髓系白血病患者结局的影响。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):765-774. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32566. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
4
Targeted deep sequencing improves outcome stratification in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with low risk cytogenetic features.靶向深度测序改善了具有低风险细胞遗传学特征的慢性粒单核细胞白血病的预后分层。
Oncotarget. 2016 Aug 30;7(35):57021-57035. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10937.
5
Genetic characteristics of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: A single institution experience.母细胞性浆细胞样树突状细胞肿瘤的遗传学特征:单机构经验
Oncotarget. 2025 Jun 17;16:495-507. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28742.
6
Targeted sequencing aids in identifying clonality in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.靶向测序有助于鉴定慢性粒单核细胞白血病中的克隆性。
Leuk Res. 2019 Sep;84:106190. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.106190. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
7
[Molecular features of 109 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in a single center].单中心109例慢性粒单核细胞白血病患者的分子特征
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2023 May 14;44(5):373-379. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2023.05.004.
8
Mutational landscape of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and its potential clinical significance.慢性粒单核细胞白血病的突变图谱及其潜在临床意义。
Int J Hematol. 2022 Jan;115(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03210-x. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
9
RUNX1 mutations promote leukemogenesis of myeloid malignancies in ASXL1-mutated leukemia.RUNX1 突变促进 ASXL1 突变性白血病中髓性恶性肿瘤的发生。
J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Oct 22;12(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0789-3.
10
Unveiling the intriguing relationship: oncogenic KRAS, morphological shifts, and mutational complexity in pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms.揭示有趣的关系:胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤中的致癌性KRAS、形态学转变和突变复杂性。
J Pathol. 2025 Apr;265(4):401-407. doi: 10.1002/path.6397. Epub 2025 Feb 5.