Borger Jessica G, Longley Rhea J, Taylor Megan F, Motrich Ruben, Payne Jennifer Ae, Kemp Roslyn A
The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Immunol Cell Biol. 2025 Mar;103(3):234-250. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12854. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
The discourse surrounding gender equity has intensified recently, amplified by the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the critical underrepresentation of women in leadership roles across various sectors including the media and healthcare. In medical research, this disparity is particularly pronounced, with women often excluded from senior positions despite their substantial presence in the workforce. This review seeks to explore the multifaceted issue of gender inequity in medical research leadership, examining the systemic barriers that women face, the socioeconomic factors that compound these challenges and the global variations in leadership representation of women. Diverse leadership teams are essential for fostering medical innovation, improving patient outcomes and ensuring that clinical trials and medical research are effective, inclusive and representative. The underrepresentation of women in leadership roles is not merely a matter of gender bias; it is intricately linked to socioeconomic factors that hinder their advancement. Women from lower socioeconomic backgrounds face additional obstacles, such as limited access to education and professional networks, which further exacerbate their underrepresentation in leadership positions. Moreover, cultural and societal norms play a significant role in shaping the career trajectories of women. As a group of immunologists, including representatives of the International Union of Immunological Sciences (IUIS) Gender Equity Committee, we review the causes of these inequities. We examine the impact of gender-diverse leadership on pre-clinical and medical research, emphasizing the need for inclusive leadership to drive progress in medical research and resulting healthcare. Finally, the review proposes strategies for improving gender equity in medical research leadership, including policy changes, organizational initiatives and societal shifts. By addressing these critical issues, this review contributes to the ongoing efforts to promote gender equity in medical research, ultimately enhancing the quality and inclusiveness of scientific inquiry and its impact on healthcare delivery.
围绕性别平等的讨论最近愈演愈烈,新冠疫情的影响使其进一步升温,凸显出女性在包括媒体和医疗保健在内的各个领域担任领导职务的比例严重偏低。在医学研究领域,这种差距尤为明显,尽管女性在从业人员中占相当比例,但她们往往被排除在高级职位之外。本综述旨在探讨医学研究领导力中性别不平等这一多方面的问题,审视女性面临的系统性障碍、加剧这些挑战的社会经济因素以及女性领导力代表性的全球差异。多元化的领导团队对于促进医学创新、改善患者治疗效果以及确保临床试验和医学研究的有效性、包容性和代表性至关重要。女性在领导岗位上代表性不足不仅是性别偏见问题;它与阻碍她们晋升的社会经济因素密切相关。来自社会经济背景较低的女性面临更多障碍,如获得教育和专业网络的机会有限,这进一步加剧了她们在领导岗位上代表性不足的情况。此外,文化和社会规范在塑造女性的职业轨迹方面发挥着重要作用。作为一群免疫学家,包括国际免疫学会联盟(IUIS)性别平等委员会的代表,我们审视了这些不平等现象的成因。我们研究了性别多元化领导对临床前和医学研究的影响,强调需要包容性领导来推动医学研究及由此产生的医疗保健领域的进步。最后,本综述提出了改善医学研究领导力中性别平等的策略,包括政策变革、组织举措和社会转变。通过解决这些关键问题,本综述为促进医学研究中的性别平等的持续努力做出了贡献,最终提高了科学探究的质量和包容性及其对医疗服务的影响。