Hu Tianpeng, Li Yan, Yan Shengtao, Sun Lichao, Lian Rui, Yu Jieqiong, Chen Jie, Liu Xiaoyu, Zhang Guoqiang
Department of Emergency Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
World J Emerg Med. 2025;16(1):35-42. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.011.
Inappropriate antibiotic treatment for patients with viral infections has led to a surge in antimicrobial resistance, increasing mortality and healthcare costs. Viral and bacterial infections are often difficult to distinguish. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA), an essential antiviral factor induced by interferon after viral infection, holds promise for distinguishing between viral and bacterial infections. This study aimed to determine the ability of MxA to distinguish viral from bacterial infections.
We quantified MxA in 121 infected patients via dry immunofluorescence chromatography. The Kruskal-Wallis test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine the diagnostic value of MxA, either alone or in combination with C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin (PCT), in patients with viral, bacterial, or co-infections.
The value of MxA (ng/mL) was significantly higher in patients with viral infections than in those with bacterial and co-infections (82.3 [24.5-182.9] vs. 16.4 [10.8-26.5], <0.0001) (82.3 [24.5-182.9] vs. 28.5 [10.2-106.8], =0.0237). The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve for distinguishing between viral and bacterial infections was 0.799 (95% confidence interval [95% ] 0.696-0.903), with a sensitivity of 68.9% (95% 54.3%-80.5%) and specificity of 90.0% (95% 74.4%-96.5%) at the threshold of 50.3 ng/mL. Combining the MxA level with the CRP or PCT level improved its ability. MxA expression was low in cytomegalovirus (15.8 [9.6-47.6] ng/mL) and Epstein-Barr virus (12.9 [8.5-21.0] ng/mL) infections.
Our study showed the diagnostic efficacy of MxA in distinguishing between viral and bacterial infections, with further enhancement when it was combined with CRP or PCT. Moreover, Epstein-Barr virus and human cytomegalovirus infections did not elicit elevated MxA expression.
对病毒感染患者进行不恰当的抗生素治疗已导致抗菌药物耐药性激增,增加了死亡率和医疗成本。病毒感染和细菌感染往往难以区分。黏液病毒抗性蛋白A(MxA)是病毒感染后由干扰素诱导产生的一种重要抗病毒因子,有望用于区分病毒感染和细菌感染。本研究旨在确定MxA区分病毒感染和细菌感染的能力。
我们通过干式免疫荧光色谱法对121例感染患者的MxA进行定量。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来确定MxA单独或与C反应蛋白(CRP)或降钙素原(PCT)联合使用时,在病毒感染、细菌感染或合并感染患者中的诊断价值。
病毒感染患者的MxA(ng/mL)值显著高于细菌感染和合并感染患者(82.3 [24.5 - 182.9] 对比 16.4 [10.8 - 26.5],<0.0001)(82.3 [24.5 - 182.9] 对比 28.5 [10.2 - 106.8],=0.0237)。区分病毒感染和细菌感染的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.799(95%置信区间[95%CI] 0.696 - 0.903),在阈值为50.3 ng/mL时,灵敏度为68.9%(95%CI 54.3% - 80.5%),特异性为90.0%(95%CI 74.4% - 96.5%)。将MxA水平与CRP或PCT水平相结合可提高其诊断能力。巨细胞病毒(15.8 [9.6 - 47.6] ng/mL)和EB病毒(12.9 [8.5 - 21.0] ng/mL)感染时MxA表达较低。
我们的研究显示了MxA在区分病毒感染和细菌感染方面的诊断效力,与CRP或PCT联合使用时诊断效力进一步增强。此外,EB病毒和人巨细胞病毒感染并未引起MxA表达升高。