• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of respiratory mechanics measurement between pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation.

作者信息

Li Zhi'ang, Li Peifang, Jiang Yiling, Zhu Jianjun, Zhu Jianliang, Xu Zhiping, Liu Lijun

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, China.

出版信息

World J Emerg Med. 2025;16(1):78-81. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.009.

DOI:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.009
PMID:39906115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11788110/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of respiratory mechanics measurement between pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation.压力控制通气与容量控制通气之间呼吸力学测量的比较。
World J Emerg Med. 2025;16(1):78-81. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.009.
2
[Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized clinical trial].[腹腔镜减肥手术中容量控制通气与压力控制通气对呼吸力学影响的比较：随机临床试验]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;69(6):546-552. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Comparisons of Pressure-controlled Ventilation with Volume Guarantee and Volume-controlled 1:1 Equal Ratio Ventilation on Oxygenation and Respiratory Mechanics during Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: a Randomized-controlled Trial.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术中压力控制通气与容量保证和容量控制 1:1 比例通气对氧合和呼吸力学的比较：一项随机对照试验。
Int J Med Sci. 2018 Oct 20;15(13):1522-1529. doi: 10.7150/ijms.28442. eCollection 2018.
4
Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed in infants and young children in the prone position: A prospective randomized study.仰卧位婴儿和幼儿容量控制通气、压力控制通气和压力控制通气-容量保证的比较：一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Aug;95:111440. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111440. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
5
The effects of volume-controlled ventilation versus pressure-controlled ventilation on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial.容量控制通气与压力控制通气对接受腰椎融合手术患者血流动力学和呼吸参数的影响：一项随机对照试验。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9553-9563. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1932.
6
The Effect of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation and Volume-Controlled Ventilation in Prone Position on Pulmonary Mechanics and Inflammatory Markers.压力控制通气和容量控制通气在俯卧位时对肺力学和炎症标志物的影响
Inflammation. 2016 Aug;39(4):1469-74. doi: 10.1007/s10753-016-0379-2.
7
A new application of an old method for respiratory mechanics measurements: the passive inflation method in newborn infants during pressure-controlled ventilation.一种用于呼吸力学测量的旧方法的新应用：压力控制通气期间新生儿的被动充气法。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994 Oct;18(4):244-54. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950180409.
8
A comparison of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation at different inspiratory to expiratory ratios.不同吸呼比下压力控制通气与容量控制通气的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Jan;41(1 Pt 1):71-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04615.x.
9
The effect of pressure-controlled ventilation on pulmonary mechanics in the prone position during posterior lumbar spine surgery: a comparison with volume-controlled ventilation.压力控制通气对后路腰椎手术中俯卧位时肺力学的影响：与容量控制通气的比较。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012 Jan;24(1):14-8. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31822c6523.
10
Volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation: a comparison of their effects in ARDS patients.容量控制通气与压力控制反比通气：对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者影响的比较
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1994 Jun;49(3):201-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Plateau Pressure and Driving Pressure in Volume- and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: Comparison of Frictional and Viscoelastic Resistive Components in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.容量控制通气和压力控制通气中的平台压与驱动压：小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征中摩擦性和粘弹性阻力成分的比较
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):750-759. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003291. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
2
Effects of early standardized enteral nutrition on preventing acute muscle loss in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with mechanical ventilation.早期标准化肠内营养对预防机械通气的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者急性肌肉丢失的影响
World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(3):193-197. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.046.
3
The effects of volume-controlled ventilation versus pressure-controlled ventilation on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial.容量控制通气与压力控制通气对接受腰椎融合手术患者血流动力学和呼吸参数的影响：一项随机对照试验。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9553-9563. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1932.
4
Low Tidal Volumes for Everyone?低潮气量通气策略适合所有人吗？
Chest. 2019 Oct;156(4):783-791. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
A Decision for Predicting Successful Extubation of Patients in Intensive Care Unit.预测 ICU 患者拔管成功的决策。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jan 4;2018:6820975. doi: 10.1155/2018/6820975. eCollection 2018.
6
Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study.可能影响急性呼吸窘迫综合征预后的可调节因素：LUNG SAFE 研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1865-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-5. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
7
Pressure-Controlled vs Volume-Controlled Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Physiology-Based Narrative and Systematic Review.急性呼吸衰竭中压力控制通气与容量控制通气：基于生理学的叙述性和系统性综述
Chest. 2015 Aug;148(2):340-355. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-3169.
8
Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.驱动压与急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的生存。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.
9
Respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients.机械通气患者的呼吸力学
Respir Care. 2014 Nov;59(11):1773-94. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03410. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
10
Pathophysiology of ventilator-associated lung injury.呼吸机相关性肺损伤的病理生理学。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Apr;25(2):123-30. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834f8c7f.