Collis Bennett, Kutmah Huda, Couch Peyton, Kale Neelima J, Roper Karen L
University of Florida College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Residency, Gainesville, FL.
Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine Residency, Dayton, OH.
PRiMER. 2025 Jan 8;9:2. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2025.751797. eCollection 2025.
Little is known about patients' perceptions of their risk for type-2 diabetes (T2D), or if knowledge of risk could facilitate weight and diabetes prevention discussions with health care professionals.
In our academic family medicine practice, 25 patients completed a previsit T2D risk assessment on their phone and answered interview and survey questions to assess their understanding of their risk for developing T2D.
Interest in their T2D risk was high, but self-estimation of risk before obtaining their score was low (21/25 reported ≤30% chance of developing diabetes). All patients perceived T2D to be very serious, most remembered their risk score (18/23 correct) when interviewed 3-5 days later, and many reported that the score increased their motivation to prevent T2D development. Despite this, the calculated risk result was not considered accurate by 8/23 patients and only 4/23 patients shared their score during their appointment visit.
T2D risk evaluation can facilitate patient awareness of their risk and lifestyle improvement, but clinician engagement and communication are needed for interpretation, treatment, and linkage to prediabetes care.
对于患者对自身患2型糖尿病(T2D)风险的认知,以及风险认知是否有助于与医护人员展开关于体重和糖尿病预防的讨论,我们知之甚少。
在我们的学术性家庭医学诊所,25名患者通过手机完成了就诊前的T2D风险评估,并回答了访谈和调查问卷中的问题,以评估他们对自身患T2D风险的理解。
患者对自身T2D风险的关注度很高,但在得知评分之前,他们对风险的自我估计很低(25人中有21人报告患糖尿病的几率≤30%)。所有患者都认为T2D非常严重,大多数患者在3至5天后接受访谈时记住了自己的风险评分(23人中有18人回答正确),许多患者表示该评分增强了他们预防T2D发生的动力。尽管如此,23名患者中有8人认为计算出的风险结果不准确,只有23名患者中的4人在预约就诊时分享了他们的评分。
T2D风险评估有助于提高患者对自身风险的认识并改善生活方式,但在解读、治疗以及与糖尿病前期护理的联系方面,需要临床医生的参与和沟通。