Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky.
Diabetes Educ. 2019 Jun;45(3):302-314. doi: 10.1177/0145721719845347. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
The purpose of the study was to assess patient and clinician perceptions of prediabetes in an academic family medicine practice. Data were collected in preparation for an implementation study to increase utilization of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (N-DPP).
In this mixed-methods study, discussions from 3 focus groups composed of patients with prediabetes were evaluated using thematic analysis for their understanding of and beliefs about prediabetes, care experiences, and attitudes toward N-DPP. Clinicians completed a Likert-scaled survey assessing attitudes and perceived barriers to providing prediabetes care.
Among the 15 focus group participants, more than half were not aware of their diagnosis. Attitudes toward prediabetes were mixed: while many believed it was serious and elicited more fear than being "at risk," others thought there were varying degrees of risk within the same diagnosis, making the diagnosis less impactful. Patients repeatedly expressed the perception that clinicians were not forthcoming about necessary behavior changes. Patients agreed on barriers to N-DPP, including scheduling and transportation. Clinicians (N = 31) concurred that patients lack awareness of their prediabetes diagnosis. They reported that time is available to screen all patients and that a prediabetes diagnosis is effective for advising patients of the need for lifestyle modification. There was consensus from both patients and clinicians that prediabetes is curable.
Increased patient awareness and patient-centered education is needed to overcome barriers to prediabetes care. To facilitate implementation of N-DPP referral processes, clinicians should clearly communicate risk, treatment information, and linkage to N-DPP as the suggested treatment plan.
本研究旨在评估学术家庭医学实践中患者和临床医生对糖尿病前期的认知。本研究数据收集是为了一项实施研究做准备,以增加对国家糖尿病预防计划(N-DPP)的利用。
在这项混合方法研究中,对由糖尿病前期患者组成的 3 个焦点小组的讨论进行了主题分析,以评估他们对糖尿病前期的理解和信念、护理经验以及对 N-DPP 的态度。临床医生完成了一份李克特量表调查,评估提供糖尿病前期护理的态度和感知障碍。
在 15 名参加焦点小组的参与者中,超过一半的人不知道自己的诊断。对糖尿病前期的态度喜忧参半:虽然许多人认为这是严重的,并引起了比“处于危险之中”更大的恐惧,但也有人认为在同一诊断中有不同程度的风险,这使得诊断的影响不那么大。患者反复表示,他们认为临床医生没有提出必要的行为改变。患者和临床医生(n=31)都认为 N-DPP 存在一些障碍,包括时间安排和交通问题。临床医生(n=31)认为他们有时间为所有患者进行筛查,而且糖尿病前期的诊断对建议患者进行生活方式改变是有效的。患者和临床医生都认为糖尿病前期是可以治愈的。
需要增加患者对糖尿病前期护理的认识和以患者为中心的教育,以克服糖尿病前期护理的障碍。为了促进 N-DPP 转诊流程的实施,临床医生应明确沟通风险、治疗信息,并将其链接到 N-DPP 作为建议的治疗计划。