Malard Benjamin, Hulko Michael, Koch Julia, Speidel Rose, Pouchoulin Dominique, Echeverri Jorge, Yessayan Lenar
From the Research and Development Department, Gambro Industries, Meyzieu, France.
Research and Development Department, Gambro Dialysatoren GmbH, Hechingen, Germany.
ASAIO J. 2025 Jun 1;71(6):510-518. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002387. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
Inflammatory mediators play a major role in the development and progression of acute kidney injury (AKI). Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) removes these mediators from the blood using AN69-M, AN69-ST, and HF1400 filters to target low and middle-molecular weight molecules. We characterized the in vitro removal performance of each filter in a 72 hour simulated CRRT procedure. Urea clearance with AN69-M and AN69-ST remained stable (52.4 and 51.2 ml/minute, respectively) but decreased with HF1400 (47.0 ml/minute; p < 0.001). Vancomycin clearance remained stable for AN69 filters but decreased for HF1400. Interleukin (IL)-8 was removed primarily via adsorption with the AN69 filters (92.2 and 91.2 ml/minute for AN69-M and AN69-ST, respectively), but clearance was significantly lower with HF1400 (8.4 ml/minute). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α clearance was higher with AN69-ST compared with AN69-M or HF1400 (10.3, 1.8, and 2.3 ml/minute, respectively). β 2 -microglobulin clearance was higher with both AN69-based filters. The hydrogel water repartition of AN69 filters was different, with a higher percentage of bound water in AN69-ST versus AN69-M (30.5% ± 0.2% and 19.3% ± 1.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). These results suggest that clearance profiles of CRRT filters differ according to their properties; further investigation is needed to translate this into clinical improvements.
炎症介质在急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生和发展中起主要作用。连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)使用AN69-M、AN69-ST和HF1400滤器从血液中清除这些介质,以针对低分子量和中分子量分子。我们在72小时的模拟CRRT过程中对每个滤器的体外清除性能进行了表征。AN69-M和AN69-ST的尿素清除率保持稳定(分别为52.4和51.2 ml/分钟),但HF1400的尿素清除率下降(47.0 ml/分钟;p<0.001)。AN69滤器的万古霉素清除率保持稳定,但HF1400的万古霉素清除率下降。白细胞介素(IL)-8主要通过与AN69滤器吸附而被清除(AN69-M和AN69-ST分别为92.2和91.2 ml/分钟),但HF1400的清除率显著较低(8.4 ml/分钟)。与AN69-M或HF1400相比,AN69-ST的肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α清除率更高(分别为10.3、1.8和2.3 ml/分钟)。两种基于AN69的滤器对β2-微球蛋白的清除率更高。AN69滤器的水凝胶水再分配不同,AN69-ST中结合水的百分比高于AN69-M(分别为30.5%±0.2%和19.3%±1.5%;p<0.05)。这些结果表明,CRRT滤器的清除特性因其性质而异;需要进一步研究将其转化为临床改善。