Bungart Brittani, Joudeh Lana, Schwenk Eric S, Chiang Christopher, Fettiplace Michael R
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anesthesiology. 2025 May 1;142(5):885-895. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005406. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
Despite the frequent use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine, there is limited guidance on redosing of these medications after an initial bolus. Intermittent redosing is a clinical practice in the setting of nerve catheters, often utilizing large doses. Comparatively, theoretical elimination rates are available from pharmacokinetic studies, providing estimates on total body content of these drugs. The authors hypothesized that published redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in clinical literature comported with safe elimination of the drugs based on pharmacokinetic studies.
Clinical redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were identified from previously published articles that used intermittent bolus dosing into the transversus abdominis plane and paravertebral space. The dosing data were fit to an exponential curve using least squares regression and 1/Y 2 weighting with the equation: Y = Y M - (Y M - Y 0 ) * e -k * x , where YM is the maximal dose (175 mg for bupivacaine, 210 mg for ropivacaine), Y0 is the dose at time zero, k is the elimination constant, and x is time. Both minimal ( i.e. , slowest) and average pharmacokinetic elimination constants for ropivacaine and bupivacaine were identified in the published literature. Clinical redosing was compared with pharmacokinetic elimination.
The maximal pharmacokinetic half-lives of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were 603 min (range, 154 to 2,970 min; N = 49) and 528 min (range, 204 to 3,276 min; N = 39), respectively. Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine fit to an exponential curve with k bupi(clinical) = 0.077 h -1 , representing the 53.5th percentile of extracted pharmacokinetic minimal elimination constants. Clinically reported redosing of ropivacaine fit to a curve with k ropi(clinical) = 0.083 h -1 consistent with the 52nd percentile of minimal pharmacokinetic elimination constants.
Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in the published literature reflect the slowest pharmacokinetic elimination based on human studies. The combined data without evidence of toxicity permit the authors to make practical recommendations about safe redosing of these agents.
尽管罗哌卡因和布比卡因被频繁使用,但关于初始推注后这些药物再次给药的指导却很有限。间歇性再次给药是在神经导管置入情况下的一种临床实践,通常使用大剂量药物。相比之下,药代动力学研究提供了理论消除率,可用于估计这些药物在体内的总量。作者推测,临床文献中公布的布比卡因和罗哌卡因再次给药情况符合基于药代动力学研究的药物安全消除标准。
从先前发表的文章中确定布比卡因和罗哌卡因的临床再次给药情况,这些文章采用间歇性推注给药至腹横肌平面和椎旁间隙。使用最小二乘法回归和1/Y²加权,将给药数据拟合为指数曲线,方程为:Y = YM - (YM - Y0) * e^(-k * x),其中YM是最大剂量(布比卡因175mg,罗哌卡因210mg),Y0是时间为零时的剂量,k是消除常数,x是时间。在已发表的文献中确定了罗哌卡因和布比卡因的最小(即最慢)和平均药代动力学消除常数。将临床再次给药情况与药代动力学消除情况进行比较。
布比卡因和罗哌卡因的最大药代动力学半衰期分别为603分钟(范围154至2970分钟;N = 49)和528分钟(范围204至3276分钟;N = 39)。临床报告的布比卡因再次给药情况拟合为指数曲线,k布比(临床)= 0.077 h⁻¹,代表提取的药代动力学最小消除常数的第53.5百分位数。临床报告的罗哌卡因再次给药情况拟合为曲线,k罗哌(临床)= 0.083 h⁻¹,与最小药代动力学消除常数的第52百分位数一致。
临床文献中报告的布比卡因和罗哌卡因再次给药情况反映了基于人体研究的最慢药代动力学消除情况。综合数据且无毒性证据使作者能够就这些药物的安全再次给药提出实用建议。