Lee Sooyoun, Kim Hyun Chul, Kim Kyung Tae, Kang Seung-Hyun, Lee SeungHwan, Yu Kyung-Sang, Lee Soyoung
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Addpharma, Inc., Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-03863-z.
This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of telmisartan/rosuvastatin/ezetimibe/amlodipine 80/20/10/5 mg and a loose-dose combination (LDC) of two FDC tablets, ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg and telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg, in healthy Korean male subjects. This study was conducted as a randomized, open-label, two-sequence, four-period crossover study. The subjects received the FDC or the LDC of telmisartan, rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, and amlodipine twice, with a 21-day washout in each period. Each sequence was composed of either FDC/LDC/FDC/LDC or LDC/FDC/LDC/FDC in that order. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 h after rosuvastatin dosing and 72 h after telmisartan, ezetimibe, and amlodipine dosing. The PK parameters were calculated by a noncompartmental method, and safety profiles were evaluated throughout the study. Fifty-four healthy Korean male subjects were enrolled, and 42 subjects completed the study. The concentration‒time profiles of telmisartan, rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, and amlodipine were similar between the FDC and LDC groups. For each compound, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the peak concentration and area under the plasma concentration‒time curve of FDC to LDC were within the conventional bioequivalence criteria of 0.8-1.25. Both the FDC and LDC treatments were well tolerated and determined to be safe. The FDC and LDC treatments with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, and amlodipine showed pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, indicating that the FDC of telmisartan/rosuvastatin/ezetimibe/amlodipine 80/20/10/5 mg can be used as an alternative to the LDC treatment.
本研究旨在比较替米沙坦/瑞舒伐他汀/依折麦布/氨氯地平80/20/10/5毫克固定剂量复方(FDC)片剂与两种FDC片剂依折麦布/瑞舒伐他汀10/20毫克和替米沙坦/氨氯地平80/5毫克的松散剂量组合(LDC)在健康韩国男性受试者中的药代动力学(PK)特征。本研究作为一项随机、开放标签、双序列、四周期交叉研究进行。受试者接受替米沙坦、瑞舒伐他汀、依折麦布和氨氯地平的FDC或LDC两次,每个周期有21天的洗脱期。每个序列按FDC/LDC/FDC/LDC或LDC/FDC/LDC/FDC的顺序组成。在瑞舒伐他汀给药后48小时以及替米沙坦、依折麦布和氨氯地平给药后72小时采集用于PK分析的系列血样。通过非房室方法计算PK参数,并在整个研究过程中评估安全性。招募了54名健康韩国男性受试者,42名受试者完成了研究。替米沙坦、瑞舒伐他汀、依折麦布和氨氯地平的浓度-时间曲线在FDC和LDC组之间相似。对于每种化合物,FDC与LDC的峰浓度和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积的几何平均比值(90%置信区间)在0.8至1.25的传统生物等效性标准范围内。FDC和LDC治疗均耐受性良好且被确定为安全。替米沙坦、瑞舒伐他汀、依折麦布和氨氯地平的FDC和LDC治疗显示药代动力学生物等效,表明替米沙坦/瑞舒伐他汀/依折麦布/氨氯地平80/20/10/5毫克的FDC可作为LDC治疗的替代方案。