Zuke William A, Hannon Charles P, Salih Rondek, Kromka Joseph, Granger Caroline, Clohisy John C, Barrack Robert L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Mar 19;107(6):e19. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00926. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
We previously reported the 5-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant. This study evaluates BHR survivorship as well as radiographic and clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up.
A total of 224 patients with contemporary indications, including 179 patients from the original study, were included in this analysis. Survivorship was calculated. Metal ion levels and radiographs were updated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared with those for matched patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). The mean follow-up was 14 years.
Survivorship free from any revision and from aseptic revision was 96.0% and 97.4% at 15 years, respectively. Two patients had undergone revision since the original study. The median serum cobalt and chromium levels were 1.4 and 1.5 ppb, respectively. The PROs were similar to those for the THA cohort. Equal proportions of patients remained active; however, the BHR group trended toward more remaining highly active (p = 0.12).
Although activity was similar to THA at long-term follow-up, the BHR implant remains an excellent option for the treatment of osteoarthritis in younger male patients.
Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
我们之前报告了伯明翰髋关节表面置换术(BHR)植入物的5年结果。本研究评估了BHR的长期随访生存率以及影像学和临床结果。
本分析纳入了224例有当代适应症的患者,其中包括179例来自原研究的患者。计算生存率。更新金属离子水平和X线片。将患者报告的结果(PROs)与接受全髋关节置换术(THA)的匹配患者的结果进行比较。平均随访时间为14年。
15年时,无任何翻修和无菌性翻修的生存率分别为96.0%和97.4%。自原研究以来,有2例患者接受了翻修。血清钴和铬水平的中位数分别为1.4和1.5 ppb。PROs与THA队列相似。保持活跃的患者比例相同;然而,BHR组有更多患者仍保持高度活跃的趋势(p = 0.12)。
尽管在长期随访中活动情况与THA相似,但BHR植入物仍是治疗年轻男性骨关节炎的极佳选择。
治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。