Ezquerra-Durán Alberto, Alcala-Gonzalez Luis G, Guillen-Del-Castillo Alfredo, Simeón-Aznar Carmen P, Barba Elizabeth, Malagelada Carolina, Hughes Michael, McMahan Zsuzsanna H
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Digestive System Research Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jun 1;64(6):3266-3279. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf064.
Gastrointestinal involvement (GI) in SSc is frequent and heterogeneous, manifesting with different degrees of dysmotility. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize evidence on prokinetics for treating SSc-related GI dysmotility.
Studies investigating the effects of prokinetic agents on GI function and/or GI symptoms in patients with SSc were systematically identified on PubMed and Embase. A qualitative data synthesis was conducted, given the (anticipated) wide heterogeneity in study designs, interventions and outcomes.
Twenty-one studies evaluating the effects of prokinetics in patients with SSc were included. Thirteen studies focused on GI motility using objective tests, eight assessed clinical responses, and six evaluated both. Cisapride (n = 5 studies), metoclopramide (n = 7 studies), octreotide (n = 4 studies) and prucalopride (n = 1 study) were among the most studied prokinetics, with varying effects on different GI anatomical regions. While metoclopramide consistently improved overall GI motility, other prokinetics provided selective benefits; cisapride improved gastric emptying and colonic motility, but not oesophageal motility, and octreotide improved small bowel motility but delayed gastric emptying. Regarding symptomatic improvement, only prucalopride was evaluated using a validated patient questionnaire, showing improvement in both upper and lower GI symptoms.
Prokinetic drugs may improve GI motility and symptoms in patients with SSc. There is an unmet need for future well-designed studies to refine patient stratification and optimize treatment outcomes.
系统性硬化症(SSc)患者的胃肠道受累情况常见且具有异质性,表现为不同程度的运动功能障碍。本系统文献综述旨在总结有关促动力药治疗SSc相关胃肠道运动功能障碍的证据。
在PubMed和Embase上系统检索研究促动力药对SSc患者胃肠道功能和/或胃肠道症状影响的研究。鉴于研究设计、干预措施和结局(预期)存在广泛异质性,进行了定性数据综合分析。
纳入了21项评估促动力药对SSc患者影响的研究。13项研究使用客观测试聚焦于胃肠道运动,8项评估临床反应,6项同时评估两者。西沙必利(n = 5项研究)、甲氧氯普胺(n = 7项研究)、奥曲肽(n = 4项研究)和普芦卡必利(n = 1项研究)是研究最多的促动力药,对不同胃肠道解剖区域有不同影响。虽然甲氧氯普胺持续改善整体胃肠道运动,但其他促动力药提供了选择性益处;西沙必利改善胃排空和结肠运动,但不改善食管运动,奥曲肽改善小肠运动但延迟胃排空。关于症状改善,仅使用经过验证的患者问卷对普芦卡必利进行了评估,结果显示上、下胃肠道症状均有改善。
促动力药可能改善SSc患者的胃肠道运动和症状。未来需要精心设计的研究来优化患者分层并改善治疗结局,这一需求尚未得到满足。