Satti Danish Iltaf, Chan Jeffrey Shi Kai, Mszar Reed, Mehta Adhya, Kwapong Yaa Adoma, Chan Raymond Ngai Chiu, Agboola Olayinka, Spatz Erica S, Spitz Jared A, Nasir Khurram, Javed Zulqarnain, Bonomo Jason A, Sharma Garima
Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Cardiovascular Analytics Group, China-UK Collaboration, Hong Kong, China.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Feb 11;85(5):515-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.026.
Despite recent efforts to address health disparities regarding social determinants of health (SDOH), the intersection between SDOH and cardiovascular health (CVH) outcomes in sexual minority (SM) individuals remain largely underexplored.
This study sought to investigate associations between SDOH profile and CVH and mortality outcomes among SM individuals in the United States.
All participants aged ≥18 years surveyed in the 2013 to 2017 National Health Interview Survey were included, except those with missing data on SM status, any CVH or SDOH domain, or any other covariate. SM status was self-reported and categorized as lesbian/gay, bisexual, or uncertain. Participants' SDOH profile was quantified using a 6-domain (economic stability, neighborhood/physical environment/social cohesion, community and social context, food, education, and health care system), 38-item score, with higher scores indicating greater social deprivation. CVH was adapted from the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework. Because detailed dietary data were unavailable, a 7-item (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, physical inactivity, inadequate sleep, and obesity) CVH score was used, with higher scores indicating worse CVH. Additionally, cardiovascular mortality was ascertained through the National Death Index using death certificate information.
The study sample consisted of 57,182 participants, representing a population of 82,826,690 persons. A worse composite SDOH score was associated with a worse CVH score in both heterosexual (adjusted rate ratio: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.13-1.15; P < 0.001) and SM individuals (adjusted rate ratio: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.12-1.20; P < 0.001), with associations appearing to be potentially stronger in the latter (P = 0.042). Subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent associations among gay/lesbian individuals and bisexual individuals, but not in those with other or uncertain sexual orientations. Further exploratory analysis showed that a worse composite SDOH score was significantly associated with higher risk of cardiovascular mortality in both heterosexual (adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06-1.28; P = 0.002) and SM individuals (adjusted HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.24-4.08; P = 0.008), with associations being significantly stronger in the latter (P interaction = 0.006).
An unfavorable SDOH profile was associated with worse CVH scores and higher cardiovascular mortality risk among SM individuals in the United States compared to their heterosexual counterparts.
尽管最近已努力解决与健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)相关的健康差异问题,但性少数群体(SM)个体的SDOH与心血管健康(CVH)结果之间的交叉关系在很大程度上仍未得到充分研究。
本研究旨在调查美国SM个体中SDOH概况与CVH及死亡率结果之间的关联。
纳入2013年至2017年国家健康访谈调查中年龄≥18岁的所有参与者,但排除那些在SM状态、任何CVH或SDOH领域或任何其他协变量方面存在数据缺失的参与者。SM状态由参与者自我报告,并分为女同性恋/男同性恋、双性恋或不确定。参与者的SDOH概况通过一个包含6个领域(经济稳定性、邻里/物理环境/社会凝聚力、社区和社会背景、食物、教育和医疗保健系统)、38个项目的评分进行量化,得分越高表明社会剥夺程度越高。CVH是根据美国心脏协会的生命八大要素框架改编的。由于无法获得详细的饮食数据,因此使用了一个包含7个项目(高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症、吸烟、身体活动不足、睡眠不足和肥胖)的CVH评分,得分越高表明CVH越差。此外,通过国家死亡指数利用死亡证明信息确定心血管死亡率。
研究样本包括57182名参与者,代表了82826690人的总体人群。在异性恋个体(调整后的率比:1.14;95%置信区间:1.13 - 1.15;P < 0.001)和SM个体(调整后的率比:1.16;95%置信区间:1.12 - 1.20;P < 0.001)中,较差的综合SDOH评分均与较差的CVH评分相关,且后者的关联似乎可能更强(P = 0.042)。亚组分析表明,男同性恋/女同性恋个体和双性恋个体之间存在一致的关联,但其他或性取向不确定的个体不存在这种关联。进一步的探索性分析表明,在异性恋个体(调整后的风险比:1.17;95%置信区间:1.06 - 1.28;P = 0.002)和SM个体(调整后的风险比:2.25;95%置信区间:1.24 - 4.08;P = 0.008)中,较差的综合SDOH评分均与心血管死亡风险较高显著相关,且后者的关联显著更强(P交互作用 = 0.006)。
与异性恋个体相比,在美国,不利的SDOH概况与SM个体较差的CVH评分和较高的心血管死亡风险相关。