Masyukova Mariya, Hayes Benjamin T, López-Castro Teresa, Fox Aaron D
Project Renewal, Inc, 8 East 3rd St, 2nd Floor, Clinic, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Feb 5;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00540-7.
Buprenorphine (BUP) treatment has been successfully integrated into primary care and other general medical settings; however, potential BUP prescribers frequently report inadequate training and resources to provide psychosocial counseling as barriers to providing care. Group medical visits, which combine psychosocial support and chronic condition management, have been described for BUP treatment, but few studies have explored what is gained and/or lost by offering BUP treatment in groups instead of individual visits.
Five focus groups with 3-11 participants each were conducted at an urban community health center that housed a mature office-based BUP treatment program. Participants were persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) who had previously received BUP treatment. A semi-structured interview guide covered the following domains: experience with BUP, experience with group counseling, and preferences for BUP in a group format or individual setting. Qualitative analysis followed a modified grounded theory approach.
Of 33 participants, 28 were male, median age range was 50-54, 20 identified as Hispanic/Latinx, and 24 reported past experiences with substance use disorder treatment groups. Four main themes were: (1) Groups can address the psychological aspects of addiction; (2) Groups introduce positive peer support; (3) Balancing OUD treatment and management of other chronic conditions; (4) Groups must be voluntary.
Findings demonstrate that many persons with OUD taking BUP desire assistance with recovery skills, peer support, and learning about the risks and benefits of BUP. Group medical visits can efficiently deliver these services in primary care, but findings also emphasize that group counseling will be best received when voluntary and group members are committed and authentic.
丁丙诺啡(BUP)治疗已成功纳入初级保健和其他普通医疗环境;然而,潜在的丁丙诺啡处方医生经常报告说,缺乏提供心理社会咨询的培训和资源是提供护理的障碍。结合心理社会支持和慢性病管理的团体医疗就诊已被描述用于丁丙诺啡治疗,但很少有研究探讨以团体形式而非个体就诊提供丁丙诺啡治疗会有哪些收获和/或损失。
在一个设有成熟的基于办公室的丁丙诺啡治疗项目的城市社区卫生中心进行了5个焦点小组访谈,每个小组有3 - 11名参与者。参与者为曾接受丁丙诺啡治疗的阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)患者。一份半结构化访谈指南涵盖以下领域:丁丙诺啡治疗经历、团体咨询经历以及对团体形式或个体环境下丁丙诺啡治疗的偏好。定性分析采用改良的扎根理论方法。
33名参与者中,28名男性,年龄中位数范围为50 - 54岁,20名被认定为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,24名报告有过物质使用障碍治疗小组的经历。四个主要主题为:(1)团体可以解决成瘾的心理方面问题;(2)团体引入积极的同伴支持;(3)平衡阿片类物质使用障碍治疗与其他慢性病管理;(4)团体必须是自愿的。
研究结果表明,许多服用丁丙诺啡的阿片类物质使用障碍患者希望在康复技能、同伴支持以及了解丁丙诺啡的风险和益处方面获得帮助。团体医疗就诊可以在初级保健中高效地提供这些服务,但研究结果也强调,当团体咨询是自愿的且团体成员投入且真诚时,团体咨询将最受欢迎。