Schrudde J, Petrovici V, Schuwerack O
Z Plast Chir. 1979 Dec;3(4):207-15.
Of 187 patients with silicone breast implants 14% developed a capsular formation as late complication needing surgical therapy. Apparently neither the volume and type of prosthesis nor the operative proceeding had any influence on the formation of a constrictive capsule. No significant difference between augmentation plasty by hypo- and aplasia respectively and breast reconstruction after subcutaneous or radical mastectomy could be noticed. There has been no explanation for unilateral hypertrophic capsule formation after simultaneously performed bilateral prosthesis implantation. Compared with other authors we had a smaller incidence of the IIIrd and IVth stage capsular formation. This is caused by: 1. The advantage of a two-stage proceeding over the simultaneous one after subcutaneous mastectomy or subsequently to reconstruction by a flap plasty after radical mastectomy. 2. Systematic drainage of the bed of the prosthesis to avoid any hematoma or big liquid accumulations. Diffusion of silicone in the tissues by spontaneous rupture of the prosthesis as further late complication is discussed in 2 cases.
在187例接受硅胶乳房植入物的患者中,14%出现包膜形成,作为晚期并发症需要手术治疗。显然,假体的体积和类型以及手术过程对紧缩性包膜的形成均无影响。分别对发育不全和乳房发育不良进行的隆乳术与皮下或根治性乳房切除术后的乳房重建之间未发现显著差异。对于同时进行双侧假体植入后单侧肥厚性包膜形成,尚无解释。与其他作者相比,我们的III期和IV期包膜形成发生率较低。这是由于:1. 与在皮下乳房切除术后同时植入假体或在根治性乳房切除术后通过皮瓣成形术重建后同时植入假体相比,分两阶段进行手术具有优势。2. 对假体床进行系统引流,以避免任何血肿或大量液体积聚。文中讨论了2例因假体自发破裂导致硅胶在组织中扩散作为进一步晚期并发症的情况。