Rhee Sung Min, Woo Chang Woo, Kim Cheol Hwan, Kim Dong Hyun, Rhee Yong Girl
Shoulder and Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Shoulder and Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(1):157-165. doi: 10.4055/cios24124. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups.
A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18-50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure.
In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group.
After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.
癫痫患者的肩关节前脱位相对严重,治疗困难且易于复发。本研究的目的是比较关节镜下Bankart修复术和开放性Latarjet手术在患有肩关节前不稳定的癫痫患者中的治疗效果,并比较开放性Latarjet手术在癫痫患者和非癫痫患者组中的治疗效果。
本研究纳入了55例(年龄18 - 50岁,45例男性和10例女性)患有肩肱关节前不稳定的患者的57个肩关节(34个优势肩),平均随访时间为24个月。在21例癫痫患者(23个肩关节)中,11例接受了开放性Latarjet手术,12例接受了关节镜下Bankart修复术。此外,对34例接受开放性Latarjet手术的非癫痫患者和接受相同手术的癫痫患者进行了比较。
在癫痫组中,接受Bankart修复术的12例患者均有轨迹内损伤,接受Latarjet手术的11例患者均有轨迹外损伤。在非癫痫组中,所有病例均为轨迹外损伤。在癫痫组中,Bankart修复术组和Latarjet手术组术后临床结果和复发率无显著差异。在Latarjet手术组中,非癫痫患者的术后再脱位率为14%(5/34例),而癫痫患者为45%(5/11例),其中4例发生在癫痫发作期间。Bankart修复术组轨迹内损伤患者的再脱位率为41%,与癫痫组Latarjet手术治疗轨迹外损伤后的复发率相似。
Latarjet手术后,癫痫组的功能结果与非癫痫组相似,但再脱位率较高。无论采用哪种手术方法,癫痫发作继发的再脱位率都非常高。鉴于关节镜下Bankart修复术复发率高,尽管存在轨迹内损伤,Latarjet手术对于癫痫患者的前向稳定可能更可取。