Vitale Rebecca J, Tinsley Liane J, Volkening Lisa K, Laffel Lori M
Section on Clinical, Behavioral and Outcomes Research, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2025 Jun;27(6):460-468. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0574. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
People with type 1 diabetes and executive function (EF) challenges (e.g., organization) often struggle with self-care. This study evaluated risks/benefits of insulin pumps in teens with EF challenges. Parents of teens with type 1 diabetes completed parent-reported Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. Severe hypoglycemia (SH) and diabetic ketoacidosis/hyperglycemia (DKA) events, collected prospectively, provided incidence rates (IR). A1c differences by pump use were compared by the presence/absence of EF challenges (Global Executive Composite score, EF indices). Adjusted multivariable models predicted A1c. Differences in SH and DKA IRs were evaluated by pump use and EF status, employing Poisson regressions. In teens with EF challenges, pump-users versus nonusers had lower A1c (8.5% vs. 9.2%, = 0.009). There were no A1c differences by pump use/nonuse in those without EF challenges. In multivariable analysis, A1c differences remained for those with EF challenges by one index; A1c was 0.65% lower in pump-users versus nonusers ( = 0.028). SH incidence did not differ by pump use or EF status. DKA incidence was lower in pump-users than nonusers (4.9 vs. 14.0 episodes/100-person-years, = 0.012) and lower in teens without than with EF challenges (4.9 vs. 14.0/100-person-years, = 0.012). In those without EF challenges, pump-users had lower DKA IR than nonpump-users (2.0 vs. 13.7/100-person-years, = 0.003). In those with EF challenges, DKA IRs did not differ by pump use. Despite occasional prescriber hesitancy, teens with type 1 diabetes and EF challenges using insulin pumps had lower A1c without increased DKA risk compared with nonpump-users.
患有1型糖尿病且存在执行功能(EF)障碍(如组织能力方面)的人在自我护理方面常常面临困难。本研究评估了胰岛素泵对于存在EF障碍的青少年的风险/益处。患有1型糖尿病青少年的父母完成了家长报告的执行功能行为评定量表。前瞻性收集的严重低血糖(SH)和糖尿病酮症酸中毒/高血糖(DKA)事件提供了发病率(IR)。通过是否存在EF障碍(综合执行能力总分、EF指标)比较使用胰岛素泵与否的糖化血红蛋白(A1c)差异。调整后的多变量模型预测A1c。采用泊松回归分析,评估SH和DKA发病率在使用胰岛素泵情况和EF状态方面的差异。在存在EF障碍的青少年中,使用胰岛素泵者与未使用者相比,A1c较低(8.5%对9.2%,P = 0.009)。在不存在EF障碍的人群中,使用或不使用胰岛素泵的A1c没有差异。在多变量分析中,存在EF障碍的人群中,根据一项指标,使用胰岛素泵者与未使用者的A1c仍存在差异;使用胰岛素泵者的A1c比未使用者低0.65%(P = 0.028)。SH发病率在使用胰岛素泵情况或EF状态方面没有差异。DKA发病率在使用胰岛素泵者中低于未使用者(4.9对14.0次/100人年,P = 0.012),在不存在EF障碍的青少年中低于存在EF障碍者(4.9对14.0/100人年,P = 0.012)。在不存在EF障碍的人群中,使用胰岛素泵者的DKA发病率低于未使用胰岛素泵者(2.0对13.7/100人年,P = 0.003)。在存在EF障碍的人群中,DKA发病率在使用胰岛素泵情况方面没有差异。尽管有时开处方者会有所犹豫,但与未使用胰岛素泵者相比,患有1型糖尿病且存在EF障碍并使用胰岛素泵的青少年A1c较低,且DKA风险没有增加。