Tennant Elizabeth, Ru Yating, Sheng Peizan, Matteson David S, Barrett Christopher B
Department of Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Economic Research and Development Impact Department, Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila 1550, Philippines.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 11;122(6):e2410350122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410350122. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
For many countries in the Global South traditional poverty estimates are available only infrequently and at coarse spatial resolutions, if at all. This limits decision-makers' and analysts' ability to target humanitarian and development interventions and makes it difficult to study relationships between poverty and other natural and human phenomena at finer spatial scales. Advances in Earth observation and machine learning-based methods have proven capable of generating more granular estimates of relative asset wealth indices. They have been less successful in predicting the consumption-based poverty measures most commonly used by decision-makers, those tied to national and international poverty lines. For a study area including four countries in southern and eastern Africa, we pilot a two-step approach that combines Earth observation, accessible machine learning methods, and asset-based structural poverty measurement to address this gap. This structural poverty approach to machine learning-based poverty estimation preserves the interpretability and policy-relevance of consumption-based poverty measures, while allowing us to explain 72 to 78% of cluster-level variation in a pooled model and 40 to 54% even when predicting out-of-country.
对于全球南方的许多国家而言,传统的贫困估计数据即便有,也只是偶尔可得,且空间分辨率粗糙。这限制了决策者和分析人员针对人道主义和发展干预措施的能力,也使得在更精细的空间尺度上研究贫困与其他自然和人类现象之间的关系变得困难。地球观测和基于机器学习的方法取得的进展已证明能够生成更细化的相对资产财富指数估计值。但它们在预测决策者最常用的基于消费的贫困指标(即与国家和国际贫困线相关的指标)方面却不太成功。对于一个包括南部和东部非洲四个国家的研究区域,我们试点了一种两步法,该方法结合了地球观测、易于使用的机器学习方法以及基于资产的结构性贫困测量,以弥补这一差距。这种基于结构性贫困的机器学习贫困估计方法保留了基于消费的贫困指标的可解释性和政策相关性,同时使我们能够在汇总模型中解释72%至78%的聚类水平变化,甚至在进行境外预测时也能解释40%至54%的变化。