Loughnan Siobhan A, Wojcieszek Aleena M, Singline Laura, Griffin Alison, Boyle Frances M, Ellwood David, Flenady Vicki, Goergen Stacy
NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute-The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Statistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr;69(3):342-351. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13828. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
There is increasing interest regarding the role and value of post-mortem imaging in identifying the causes of stillbirth. We sought to understand the experiences of parents and the perceptions and practices of midwives and obstetricians regarding post-mortem imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound and X-rays of the baby), in the investigation of stillbirths, and how its use and perceived value compares to that of other stillbirth investigations.
Cross-sectional, web-based surveys of parents who experienced stillbirth in Australia from 2018 to 2022 and midwives and obstetricians involved in the care of parents who experienced stillbirth in the same 5 years. Data were analysed descriptively.
Data from 68 parents and 94 midwives and obstetricians were included. According to parents, post-mortem imaging (CT, MRI, ultrasound and X-ray) were the least discussed (1%-16%) and performed (0%-13%) stillbirth investigations. Twenty-eight percent of midwives and obstetricians had recommended the option of post-mortem imaging to parents, while 45% felt that doing so was beyond their scope of practice. Relative to autopsy, midwives and obstetricians were often unsure of the value of MRI across a range of clinical scenarios, and CT, MRI, ultrasound and X-ray were the investigations least often discussed (17%-47%) with parents.
Post-mortem imaging is currently underutilised in the investigation of stillbirths. Education and training are needed to enhance maternity care professionals' awareness of the role and value of imaging for identifying the causes of stillbirths, and how best to discuss these investigations with families.
关于尸检成像在确定死产原因方面的作用和价值,人们的兴趣与日俱增。我们试图了解父母的经历,以及助产士和产科医生在死产调查中对尸检成像(婴儿的计算机断层扫描[CT]、磁共振成像[MRI]、超声和X射线)的看法和做法,以及其使用情况和感知价值与其他死产调查相比如何。
对2018年至2022年在澳大利亚经历死产的父母以及在同一5年中参与照顾死产父母的助产士和产科医生进行基于网络的横断面调查。对数据进行描述性分析。
纳入了68名父母以及94名助产士和产科医生的数据。据父母称,尸检成像(CT、MRI、超声和X射线)是讨论最少(1%-16%)且实施最少(0%-13%)的死产调查方式。28%的助产士和产科医生曾向父母推荐尸检成像选项,而45%的人认为这样做超出了他们的执业范围。相对于尸检,助产士和产科医生在一系列临床场景中往往不确定MRI的价值,并且CT、MRI、超声和X射线是与父母讨论最少(17%-47%)的调查方式。
目前尸检成像在死产调查中的利用不足。需要开展教育和培训,以提高产科护理专业人员对成像在确定死产原因方面的作用和价值的认识,以及如何最好地与家庭讨论这些调查。