Salim Hamza, Hamdan Dawoud, Adeeb Nimer, Kandregula Sandeep, Aslan Assala, Musmar Basel, Ogilvy Christopher S, Dmytriw Adam A, Abdelsalam Ahmed, Ataoglu Cagdas, Erginoglu Ufuk, Kondziolka Douglas, El Naamani Kareem, Sheehan Jason, Ironside Natasha, Kumbhare Deepak, Gummadi Sanjeev, Essibayi Muhammed Amir, Tos Salem M, Keles Abdullah, Muram Sandeep, Sconzo Daniel, Rezai Arwin, Alwakaa Omar, Pöppe Johannes, Sen Rajeev D, Baskaya Mustafa K, Griessenauer Christoph J, Jabbour Pascal, Tjoumakaris Stavropoula I, Atallah Elias, Riina Howard, Abushehab Abdallah, Swaid Christian, Burkhardt Jan-Karl, Starke Robert M, Sekhar Laligam N, Levitt Michael R, Altschul David J, Haranhalli Neil, McAvoy Malia, Abla Adib, Stapleton Christopher, Koch Matthew J, Srinivasan Visish M, Chen Peng Roc, Blackburn Spiros, Cochran Joseph, Choudhri Omar, Pukenas Bryan, Orbach Darren B, Smith Edward R, Moehlenbruch Markus, Mosimann Pascal J, Alaraj Ali, Aziz-Sultan Mohammad Ali, Patel Aman B, Yedavalli Vivek, Wintermark Max, Savardekar Amey, Cuellar Hugo H, Lawton Michael T, Morcos Jacques J, Guthikonda Bharat
Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
Department of Neuroradiology, MD Anderson Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 16;96(8):766-774. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2024-334974.
Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are abnormal connections between feeding arteries and draining veins, associated with significant risks of haemorrhage, seizures and other neurological deficits. Preoperative embolization is commonly used as an adjunct to microsurgical resection, with the aim of reducing intraoperative complications and improving outcomes. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach remain controversial.
This study is a subanalysis of the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs consortium. We retrospectively analysed 486 patients with brain AVMs treated with microsurgical resection between January 2010 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent microsurgery alone (n=245) and those who received preoperative embolization, followed by microsurgery (n=241). Propensity score matching was employed, resulting in 288 matched patients (144 in each group). The primary outcomes were rates of complete AVM obliteration and functional outcomes (measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)). Secondary outcomes included complication rates, mortality, hospital length of stay and postsurgical rupture.
After matching, the complete obliteration rate was 97% with no significant difference between the microsurgery-only group and the preoperative embolization group (p=0.12). The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0-2 at the last follow-up was similar in both groups (83% vs 84%; p=0.67). The median hospital stay was significantly longer for the embolisation group (9 days vs 7 days; p=0.017). Complication rates (24% vs 22%; p=0.57) and mortality rates (4.9% vs 2.1%; p=0.20) were comparable between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in postsurgical rupture, recurrence or retreatment rates.
In this large multicentre study, preoperative embolization did not significantly improve AVM obliteration rates, functional outcomes or reduce complications compared with microsurgery alone.
脑动静脉畸形(AVM)是供血动脉与引流静脉之间的异常连接,伴有出血、癫痫发作及其他神经功能缺损的重大风险。术前栓塞术通常用作显微外科切除术的辅助手段,旨在减少术中并发症并改善预后。然而,这种方法的疗效和安全性仍存在争议。
本研究是脑动静脉畸形治疗多中心国际研究联盟的一项亚分析。我们回顾性分析了2010年1月至2023年12月期间接受显微外科切除术治疗的486例脑动静脉畸形患者。患者分为两组:单纯接受显微手术的患者(n = 245)和接受术前栓塞术,随后进行显微手术的患者(n = 241)。采用倾向评分匹配法,最终得到288例匹配患者(每组144例)。主要结局指标为AVM完全闭塞率和功能结局(采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)测量)。次要结局指标包括并发症发生率、死亡率、住院时间和术后破裂情况。
匹配后,完全闭塞率为97%,单纯显微手术组与术前栓塞组之间无显著差异(p = 0.12)。两组在最后一次随访时mRS评分为0 - 2的患者比例相似(83%对84%;p = 0.67)。栓塞组的中位住院时间显著更长(9天对7天;p = 0.017)。两组的并发症发生率(24%对22%;p = 0.57)和死亡率(4.9%对2.1%;p = 0.20)相当。术后破裂、复发或再次治疗率方面未观察到显著差异。
在这项大型多中心研究中,与单纯显微手术相比,术前栓塞术并未显著提高AVM闭塞率、改善功能结局或减少并发症。