Tagliacollo Victor A, de Pinna Mario, Chuctaya Junior, Datovo Alessio
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Rua Ceará - S/N, Umuarama, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré 481, Ipiranga, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cladistics. 2025 Apr;41(2):212-222. doi: 10.1111/cla.12606. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
Quantitative traits are a source of evolutionary information often difficult to handle in cladistics. Tools exist to analyse this kind of data without subjective discretization, avoiding biases in the delimitation of categorical states. Nonetheless, our ability to accurately infer relationships from continuous characters is incompletely understood, particularly under parsimony analysis. This study evaluates the accuracy of phylogenetic reconstructions from simulated matrices of continuous characters evolving under alternative evolutionary processes and analysed by parsimony. We sampled 100 empirical trees to simulate 9000 matrices, each containing between 25 and 50 taxa, and 50 and 150 continuous characters evolving under three evolutionary processes: Brownian motion, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and early burst with variable parametrizations. Our cladogram comparisons revealed that continuous character matrices, when properly coded and analysed by parsimony in TNT, carry phylogenetic signals from which species relationships can be inferred, regardless of the evolutionary models and parameterization schemes. Interestingly, implementing equal weighting or implied weighting with varying penalization strengths against homoplasies did not affect cladogram reconstructions based on continuous characters. Finally, the accuracy of continuous characters in resolving species relationships is skewed towards apical nodes of the recovered trees. Our findings provide general insights of the utility of quantitative traits in cladistics and demonstrate that their effectiveness in estimating shallower nodes is independent of the underlying evolutionary model, parameters and weighting schemes.
数量性状是系统发育学中常常难以处理的进化信息来源。现有工具可用于分析此类数据,而无需进行主观离散化,从而避免在分类状态划分中产生偏差。尽管如此,我们从连续性状准确推断关系的能力尚未得到充分理解,尤其是在简约分析的情况下。本研究评估了在替代进化过程下演化并通过简约法分析的连续性状模拟矩阵进行系统发育重建的准确性。我们抽取了100棵经验树来模拟9000个矩阵,每个矩阵包含25至50个分类单元,以及在三种进化过程下演化的50至150个连续性状:布朗运动、奥恩斯坦-乌伦贝克过程和具有可变参数化的早期爆发过程。我们的分支图比较表明,连续性状矩阵在TNT中经过适当编码并通过简约法分析时,携带了可以从中推断物种关系的系统发育信号,无论进化模型和参数化方案如何。有趣的是,采用等权重或针对同塑性具有不同惩罚强度的隐含权重,并不会影响基于连续性状的分支图重建。最后,连续性状在解析物种关系方面的准确性偏向于所恢复树的顶端节点。我们的研究结果为数量性状在系统发育学中的效用提供了一般性见解,并表明它们在估计较浅节点方面的有效性与潜在的进化模型、参数和加权方案无关。