Thrombectomy With Bridging Thrombolytic May Benefit Asian Patients More Than Non-Asian Patients: Insights From DIRECT-SAFE Sub-Analysis.
作者信息
Barker James L, Swarup Oshi, Kusuma Yohanna, Churilov Leonid, Donnan Geoffrey, Davis Stephen M, Mitchell Peter J, Yan Bernard
机构信息
Department of Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
School of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia.
出版信息
J Stroke. 2025 Jan;27(1):118-121. doi: 10.5853/jos.2024.02005. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Thrombectomy With Bridging Thrombolytic May Benefit Asian Patients More Than Non-Asian Patients: Insights From DIRECT-SAFE Sub-Analysis.桥接溶栓取栓术对亚洲患者的益处可能大于非亚洲患者：DIRECT-SAFE亚组分析的见解
J Stroke. 2025 Jan;27(1):118-121. doi: 10.5853/jos.2024.02005. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard bridging thrombolytic with endovascular thrombectomy within 4·5 h of stroke onset: an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised non-inferiority trial.血管内血栓切除术与标准桥接溶栓联合血管内血栓切除术治疗脑卒中发病 4.5 小时内的随机非劣效性试验：开放标签、盲终点、随机对照研究。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):116-125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00564-5.
3
Efficacy and safety of bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy for tandem lesions in acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性缺血性卒中串联病变血管内治疗中桥接治疗与直接取栓的疗效和安全性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Nov;234:108005. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108005. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
4
DIRECT-SAFE: A Randomized Controlled Trial of DIRECT Endovascular Clot Retrieval versus Standard Bridging Therapy.DIRECT-SAFE：直接血管内取栓与标准桥接治疗的随机对照试验
J Stroke. 2022 Jan;24(1):57-64. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.03475. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Functional and radiological outcomes after bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy in stroke patients with unknown onset: Bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy in unknown onset stroke patients with 10-point ASPECTS.桥接治疗与直接取栓治疗对发病时间不明的脑卒中患者的功能和影像学结局：10 分 ASPECTS 评分的发病时间不明脑卒中患者的桥接治疗与直接取栓治疗比较。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jan;28(1):209-219. doi: 10.1111/ene.14529. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
6
Direct Thrombectomy versus Bridging Thrombectomy within 6 Hours of Stroke Onset: A Prospective Cohort Study on Cognitive and Physical Function Outcomes.直接取栓与发病 6 小时内桥接取栓治疗对卒中患者认知和身体功能结局的前瞻性队列研究。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):1875-1881.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
7
Safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in different age groups of acute ischemic stroke patients.不同年龄组急性缺血性卒中患者桥接静脉溶栓联合机械取栓与直接机械取栓的安全性和有效性
Acta Neurol Belg. 2025 Feb;125(1):141-148. doi: 10.1007/s13760-024-02672-0. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
8
Comparing Bridging Thrombolysis with Direct Thrombectomy in Stroke due to Large Vessel Occlusion- Indian Experience (LVO-Direct).大血管闭塞性卒中桥接溶栓与直接取栓的比较——印度经验（LVO-Direct）
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022 Sep-Oct;25(5):869-874. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_1062_21. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
Direct mechanical thrombectomy without intravenous thrombolysis versus bridging therapy for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.直接机械取栓与静脉溶栓桥接治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的Meta 分析：随机对照试验研究。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Aug;16(6):621-631. doi: 10.1177/17474930211021353. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
10
The Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban Use in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Intravenous Thrombolysis Applicable Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke-a Post Hoc Analysis from the Direct-MT Trial.替罗非班用于血管内血栓切除术治疗大血管闭塞性卒中静脉溶栓适用患者的疗效和安全性：来自 DIRECT-MT 试验的事后分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Feb;47(2):208-215. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03540-9. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
本文引用的文献
1
Time to Treatment With Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Thrombectomy and Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.静脉溶栓治疗时间与急性缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗后功能结局的关系：一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2024 Mar 5;331(9):764-777. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0589.
2
Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Imaging of Atherosclerotic Intracranial Disease.动脉粥样硬化性颅内疾病的流行病学、病理生理学和影像学。
Stroke. 2024 Feb;55(2):311-323. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043630. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
Diagnosis and management of occlusion in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中闭塞的诊断与处理
Eur J Radiol Open. 2023 Aug 14;11:100513. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100513. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Association between thrombus composition and stroke etiology in the MR CLEAN Registry biobank.MR CLEAN 注册生物样本库中血栓成分与卒中病因的相关性研究。
Neuroradiology. 2023 May;65(5):933-943. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03115-y. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
5
Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard bridging thrombolytic with endovascular thrombectomy within 4·5 h of stroke onset: an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised non-inferiority trial.血管内血栓切除术与标准桥接溶栓联合血管内血栓切除术治疗脑卒中发病 4.5 小时内的随机非劣效性试验：开放标签、盲终点、随机对照研究。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):116-125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00564-5.
6
Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients with stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised non-inferiority trial.单纯取栓与静脉溶栓桥接取栓治疗脑卒中患者的效果比较：一项开放标签、盲法结局、随机非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):104-115. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00537-2.
7
Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial.单纯血管内治疗与静脉溶栓联合血管内治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能独立性的影响：DEVT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):234-243. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23523.
8
Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy Without vs With Intravenous Thrombolysis on Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SKIP Randomized Clinical Trial.机械取栓与静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响：SKIP 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):244-253. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23522.
9
Let the question determine the methods: descriptive epidemiology done right.让问题决定方法：正确的描述性流行病学。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Oct;123(9):1351-1352. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-1019-z. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke.血管内血栓切除术联合或不联合静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1981-1993. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001123. Epub 2020 May 6.
Zotero 插件