Suppr超能文献

提高定量教育干预研究中的报告标准:引入CLOSER和CIDER检查表。

Improving reporting standards in quantitative educational intervention research: introducing the CLOSER and CIDER checklists.

作者信息

Upsher Rebecca, Dommett Eleanor, Carlisle Sophie, Conner Sarah, Codina Geraldene, Nobili Anna, Byrom Nicola C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J New Approaches Educ Res. 2025;14(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In educational research, the complexity of interventions and the diversity of contexts challenge the adequacy of existing reporting standards, primarily tailored for health interventions and randomised controlled trials. Recognising the critical need for appropriate tools to support education research, we developed two checklists: the CheckList Of Standards of reporting in Education Research (CLOSER) and the Checklist for Intervention Description of Education Research (CIDER). CLOSER was designed to guide the comprehensive reporting of quantitative educational intervention research from the abstract to the discussion for multiple study designs. Concurrently, CIDER details the precise features of educational interventions. The final refinements of CLOSER and CIDER comprise of 34 and 17 items, respectively, developed through a five-stage process, including tool adaptation, expert feedback, a 2-round modified Delphi consensus survey, and final refinements. These checklists aim to enhance the clarity of educational intervention research findings, facilitating their replicability and subsequent meaningful translation into practice and policy. This addresses the gap in educational research reporting standards and sets the stage for a more robust, evidence-informed approach to educational intervention development and evaluation.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9.

摘要

未标注

在教育研究中,干预措施的复杂性和背景的多样性对现有报告标准的充分性提出了挑战,这些标准主要是为健康干预和随机对照试验量身定制的。认识到迫切需要合适的工具来支持教育研究,我们制定了两份清单:教育研究报告标准清单(CLOSER)和教育研究干预描述清单(CIDER)。CLOSER旨在指导从摘要到讨论的多种研究设计的定量教育干预研究的全面报告。同时,CIDER详细说明了教育干预的精确特征。CLOSER和CIDER的最终完善分别包括34项和17项,通过五个阶段的过程制定,包括工具改编、专家反馈、两轮修改后的德尔菲共识调查和最终完善。这些清单旨在提高教育干预研究结果的清晰度,促进其可重复性,并随后有意义地转化为实践和政策。这解决了教育研究报告标准中的差距,并为更强大、基于证据的教育干预开发和评估方法奠定了基础。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
Improving reporting standards in quantitative educational intervention research: introducing the CLOSER and CIDER checklists.
J New Approaches Educ Res. 2025;14(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
2

引用本文的文献

1
Redox cycling of sulfur via microbes in soil boosts the bioavailability of nutrients to Brassica napus.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 24;20(2):e0318936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318936. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
The DoCTRINE Guidelines: Defined Criteria To Report INnovations in Education.
Acad Med. 2022 May 1;97(5):689-695. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004634. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
4
Overview of Reviews Using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) as a Measure of Trial Intervention Reporting Quality.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug;102(8):1623-1632. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.397. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
5
On the Use and Value of Reporting Guidelines in Health Professions Education Research.
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1619-1622. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003666.
6
Research Pearls: Checklists and Flowcharts to Improve Research Quality.
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jul;36(7):2030-2038. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.046. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
Sampling Methods.
J Hum Lact. 2020 May;36(2):224-226. doi: 10.1177/0890334420906850. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Research Pearls: Expert Consensus Based Evidence Using the Delphi Method.
Arthroscopy. 2018 Dec;34(12):3278-3282. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.004.
10
Blinding: Linking Evidence to Practice.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Oct;48(10):825-826. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.0705.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验