Upsher Rebecca, Dommett Eleanor, Carlisle Sophie, Conner Sarah, Codina Geraldene, Nobili Anna, Byrom Nicola C
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK.
J New Approaches Educ Res. 2025;14(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
In educational research, the complexity of interventions and the diversity of contexts challenge the adequacy of existing reporting standards, primarily tailored for health interventions and randomised controlled trials. Recognising the critical need for appropriate tools to support education research, we developed two checklists: the CheckList Of Standards of reporting in Education Research (CLOSER) and the Checklist for Intervention Description of Education Research (CIDER). CLOSER was designed to guide the comprehensive reporting of quantitative educational intervention research from the abstract to the discussion for multiple study designs. Concurrently, CIDER details the precise features of educational interventions. The final refinements of CLOSER and CIDER comprise of 34 and 17 items, respectively, developed through a five-stage process, including tool adaptation, expert feedback, a 2-round modified Delphi consensus survey, and final refinements. These checklists aim to enhance the clarity of educational intervention research findings, facilitating their replicability and subsequent meaningful translation into practice and policy. This addresses the gap in educational research reporting standards and sets the stage for a more robust, evidence-informed approach to educational intervention development and evaluation.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9.
在教育研究中,干预措施的复杂性和背景的多样性对现有报告标准的充分性提出了挑战,这些标准主要是为健康干预和随机对照试验量身定制的。认识到迫切需要合适的工具来支持教育研究,我们制定了两份清单:教育研究报告标准清单(CLOSER)和教育研究干预描述清单(CIDER)。CLOSER旨在指导从摘要到讨论的多种研究设计的定量教育干预研究的全面报告。同时,CIDER详细说明了教育干预的精确特征。CLOSER和CIDER的最终完善分别包括34项和17项,通过五个阶段的过程制定,包括工具改编、专家反馈、两轮修改后的德尔菲共识调查和最终完善。这些清单旨在提高教育干预研究结果的清晰度,促进其可重复性,并随后有意义地转化为实践和政策。这解决了教育研究报告标准中的差距,并为更强大、基于证据的教育干预开发和评估方法奠定了基础。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9获取的补充材料。