Suppr超能文献

用于制定《试验报告统一标准》(CONSORT)声明的共识驱动扩展版的方法和结果,该扩展版针对使用队列和常规收集数据进行的试验(CONSORT-ROUTINE)。

Methods and results used in the development of a consensus-driven extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE).

作者信息

Imran Mahrukh, Kwakkenbos Linda, McCall Stephen J, McCord Kimberly A, Fröbert Ole, Hemkens Lars G, Zwarenstein Merrick, Relton Clare, Rice Danielle B, Langan Sinéad M, Benchimol Eric I, Thabane Lehana, Campbell Marion K, Sampson Margaret, Erlinge David, Verkooijen Helena M, Moher David, Boutron Isabelle, Ravaud Philippe, Nicholl Jon, Uher Rudolf, Sauvé Maureen, Fletcher John, Torgerson David, Gale Chris, Juszczak Edmund, Thombs Brett D

机构信息

Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Behavioural Science Institute, Clinical Psychology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 29;11(4):e049093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049093.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Randomised controlled trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data, including registries, electronic health records and administrative databases, are increasingly used in healthcare intervention research. A Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement extension for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE) has been developed with the goal of improving reporting quality. This article describes the processes and methods used to develop the extension and decisions made to arrive at the final checklist.

METHODS

The development process involved five stages: (1) identification of the need for a reporting guideline and project launch; (2) conduct of a scoping review to identify possible modifications to CONSORT 2010 checklist items and possible new extension items; (3) a three-round modified Delphi study involving key stakeholders to gather feedback on the checklist; (4) a consensus meeting to finalise items to be included in the extension, followed by stakeholder piloting of the checklist; and (5) publication, dissemination and implementation of the final checklist.

RESULTS

27 items were initially developed and rated in Delphi round 1, 13 items were rated in round 2 and 11 items were rated in round 3. Response rates for the Delphi study were 92 of 125 (74%) invited participants in round 1, 77 of 92 (84%) round 1 completers in round 2 and 62 of 77 (81%) round 2 completers in round 3. Twenty-seven members of the project team representing a variety of stakeholder groups attended the in-person consensus meeting. The final checklist includes five new items and eight modified items. The extension Explanation & Elaboration document further clarifies aspects that are important to report.

CONCLUSION

Uptake of CONSORT-ROUTINE and accompanying Explanation & Elaboration document will improve conduct of trials, as well as the transparency and completeness of reporting of trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data.

摘要

目的

使用队列及常规收集的数据(包括登记处数据、电子健康记录和行政数据库)进行的随机对照试验在医疗保健干预研究中越来越常用。已制定了一份针对使用队列及常规收集的数据进行的试验的《报告试验的统一标准》(CONSORT)声明扩展版(CONSORT-ROUTINE),目的是提高报告质量。本文描述了制定该扩展版所采用的流程和方法以及为得出最终清单所做的决策。

方法

制定过程包括五个阶段:(1)确定报告指南的需求并启动项目;(2)进行范围审查,以确定对CONSORT 2010清单项目可能的修改以及可能的新扩展项目;(3)开展三轮经修改的德尔菲研究,让关键利益相关者参与,以收集对清单的反馈;(4)召开共识会议,确定扩展版中要纳入的项目,随后让利益相关者试用清单;(5)发布、传播和实施最终清单。

结果

在德尔菲研究的第一轮中,最初制定并评级了27个项目,第二轮评级了13个项目,第三轮评级了11个项目。德尔菲研究的回复率分别为:第一轮,125名受邀参与者中有92名(74%)回复;第二轮,第一轮的92名完成者中有77名(84%)回复;第三轮,第二轮的77名完成者中有62名(81%)回复。代表各种利益相关者群体的27名项目团队成员参加了面对面的共识会议。最终清单包括5个新项目和8个修改后的项目。扩展版的《解释与详述》文件进一步阐明了报告中重要方面的内容。

结论

采用CONSORT-ROUTINE及配套的《解释与详述》文件将改善试验的实施,以及使用队列及常规收集的数据进行的试验报告的透明度和完整性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fa6/8094349/3f7fcac54b51/bmjopen-2021-049093f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验