Whaley Christopher, Radhakrishnan Nandita, Richards Michael, Simon Kosali, Chartock Benjamin
School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, United States.
Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jan 21;3(2):qxaf011. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf011. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Competition in health care markets should lead to lower prices and less dispersion, with consumer choice as the driving mechanism. Several studies document price variation, suggesting room for improvement; however, they relied on selected data from insurers who provide access to data, limiting generalizability. We document the nature of price variation in the private US market across geography, payer, and provider by leveraging a new dataset, implementing a descriptive analysis using the most comprehensive data available: Transparency-in-Coverage. We measured health care prices in 3 ways: percentile distribution prices for common services, state-level and insurer-level facility fee price indices, and regression-adjusted mean inpatient and outpatient prices. Variation is large: the mean facility fee for a foot X-ray, for example, is $86 at Anthem and $190 at UnitedHealth. Pricing does not appear to be uniform; there is just 22% correlation between an insurer's inpatient price and outpatient facility price. And there is little difference in ordering of high-price states depending on alternative measures, such as relative to Medicare. Results suggest greater consideration of policies to address high and variable prices for US health care.
医疗保健市场的竞争应以消费者选择为驱动机制,从而带来更低的价格和更小的价格差异。多项研究记录了价格差异,表明仍有改进空间;然而,这些研究依赖于从提供数据访问权限的保险公司选取的数据,限制了研究结果的普遍性。我们利用一个新数据集,通过使用现有最全面的数据(《医保覆盖透明度》)进行描述性分析,记录了美国私人市场中价格差异在地域、付款方和供应商方面的性质。我们通过三种方式衡量医疗保健价格:常见服务的百分位数分布价格、州级和保险公司级别的设施费用价格指数,以及回归调整后的住院和门诊平均价格。价格差异很大:例如,安盛保险公司足部X光的平均设施费用为86美元,而联合健康保险公司则为190美元。定价似乎并不统一;保险公司的住院价格与门诊设施价格之间的相关性仅为22%。而且,根据诸如相对于医疗保险等替代衡量标准,高价州的排名差异不大。结果表明,应更多地考虑制定政策来解决美国医疗保健价格高昂且波动的问题。