Hulshoff Cecile C, Spaanderman Marc E A, Scholten Ralph R, van Drongelen Joris
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):685-696. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15065. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
To prevent extreme preterm birth, women with cervical insufficiency are eligible for transabdominal cerclage in case of prior failure or technical impossibility for transvaginal cerclage. This study aimed to identify patient characteristics that affect the success rate of transabdominal cerclage to prevent extreme preterm birth in women with cervical insufficiency.
Single-center retrospective cohort study in 87 women who underwent transabdominal cerclage by open laparotomy during first and early second trimester of pregnancy over a 20-year period. Participants were divided into subgroups according to indication for the intervention. Linear regression and meta-regression-analyses were performed to assess the effect of mean cervical length (before and after transabdominal cerclage placement) and gestational age of previous preterm birth, on gestational age at delivery. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate treatment effects on gestational age at delivery.
Of 87 women, 62 women underwent a history-indicated and 25 an ultrasound-indicated transabdominal cerclage. Fetal survival was 92%: 91% in the history-indicated and 96% in the ultrasound-indicated group. Median gestational age at delivery was 37.3 weeks, with a median pregnancy prolongation of 163.0 days and with 92% of deliveries ≥34 weeks. Between groups, irrespective of singleton and twin pregnancies, outcomes were comparable. Gestational age at delivery was neither affected by cervical length before transabdominal cerclage, distance between transabdominal cerclage and external os, gestational age of previous preterm birth nor additional progesterone treatment.
The efficacy of transvaginal cerclage placement via open laparotomy during high-risk pregnancy is favorable and relates to fetal survival of 92%. Regardless of indication, pregnancy outcomes after transabdominal cerclage are similar, and independent of gestational age at previous preterm birth, cervical length before transabdominal cerclage placement, distance between transabdominal cerclage and external os, and additional progesterone administration.
为预防极早早产,对于宫颈机能不全的女性,若先前经阴道宫颈环扎失败或技术上无法实施经阴道宫颈环扎,则适合行经腹宫颈环扎术。本研究旨在确定影响经腹宫颈环扎术成功率的患者特征,以预防宫颈机能不全女性的极早早产。
一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了87名在20年期间于妊娠早期和中期经腹行开放性剖腹宫颈环扎术的女性。参与者根据干预指征分为亚组。进行线性回归和meta回归分析,以评估平均宫颈长度(经腹宫颈环扎前后)和既往早产的孕周对分娩孕周的影响。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估对分娩孕周的治疗效果。
87名女性中,62名接受了病史指征的经腹宫颈环扎术,25名接受了超声指征的经腹宫颈环扎术。胎儿存活率为92%:病史指征组为91%,超声指征组为96%。分娩时的中位孕周为37.3周,中位妊娠延长163.0天,92%的分娩孕周≥34周。在各组之间,无论单胎和双胎妊娠,结局均具有可比性。经腹宫颈环扎术前的宫颈长度、经腹宫颈环扎与宫颈外口的距离、既往早产的孕周以及额外的孕激素治疗均未影响分娩孕周。
高危妊娠期间经开放性剖腹行经阴道宫颈环扎术的疗效良好,胎儿存活率为92%。无论指征如何,经腹宫颈环扎术后的妊娠结局相似,且与既往早产的孕周、经腹宫颈环扎术前的宫颈长度、经腹宫颈环扎与宫颈外口的距离以及额外的孕激素给药无关。