Cifra Christina L, Lin Olivia, Gonzales Celestine L, Pantekidis Irene, Chegondi Madhuradhar, Graciano Ana Lia, Gradidge Eleanor, Malone Matthew P, Marx Matthew H M, Parikh Nehal R, Woods-Hill Charlotte Z, Landrigan Christopher P
Division of Medical Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 May 1;26(5):e669-e679. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003702. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
Poor communication during interfacility transfer to the PICU can harm critically ill children. Structured handoff communication can prevent harm; however, the landscape of interfacility referral communication practices across PICUs is unknown. Our objective was to describe interfacility referral communication practices among U.S. PICUs to begin identifying potential improvement opportunities.
Mixed methods study including a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews.
U.S. PICUs with greater than or equal to 10 beds in 2023.
Clinical/administrative PICU leaders.
None.
Sixty surveys with greater than 70% completed questions were returned from 170 invited participants (35% response rate). Respondents were mainly pediatric critical care medicine division chiefs (48%) or PICU medical directors (32%). PICUs in all U.S. continental regions were represented, which had a median of 1200 (interquartile range [IQR], 1000-1500) admissions per year, of which 29.5% (IQR, 15-39%) were patients directly transferred from other institutions. In 93% of PICUs, a verbal interfacility handoff occurs between the referring clinician and a PICU physician; however, only 24% were always guided by a standard communication tool. In 72% of PICUs, medical records were only sometimes available before patient arrival. Semi-structured interviews with seven volunteer respondents revealed the following themes: 1) standardizing communication can result in organized and efficient handoffs but may also result in inefficiencies, 2) trained staff dedicated to interfacility referrals will improve communication quality, 3) integration of handoff information into the electronic health record will improve dissemination and decrease PICU physicians' workload, and 4) implementing a structured process will require staff support to change current workflows.
Referral communication for interfacility patient transfers to the PICU occurred mainly through unstructured verbal handoffs between referring clinicians and PICU physicians. PICU leaders identified several potential benefits and challenges of standardizing interfacility referral communication.
在向儿科重症监护病房(PICU)进行机构间转运期间,沟通不畅可能会对危重症儿童造成伤害。结构化的交接沟通可以预防伤害;然而,各PICU之间机构间转诊沟通实践的情况尚不清楚。我们的目标是描述美国PICU之间的机构间转诊沟通实践,以便开始确定潜在的改进机会。
混合方法研究,包括横断面调查和半结构化访谈。
2023年床位大于或等于10张的美国PICU。
临床/行政PICU负责人。
无。
170名受邀参与者中有60份调查问卷返回,其中超过70%的问题已完成作答(回复率35%)。受访者主要是儿科重症医学科主任(48%)或PICU医疗主任(32%)。涵盖了美国大陆所有地区的PICU,这些PICU每年的入院中位数为1200例(四分位间距[IQR],1000 - 1500例),其中29.5%(IQR,15 - 39%)是直接从其他机构转诊来的患者。在93%的PICU中,转诊临床医生与PICU医生之间会进行口头的机构间交接;然而,只有24%始终遵循标准沟通工具。在72%的PICU中,病历仅在患者到达前有时能获取到。对7名志愿者受访者进行的半结构化访谈揭示了以下主题:1)标准化沟通可带来有组织且高效的交接,但也可能导致效率低下,2)配备专门负责机构间转诊的训练有素的工作人员将提高沟通质量,3)将交接信息整合到电子健康记录中将改善信息传播并减轻PICU医生的工作量,4)实施结构化流程需要工作人员的支持以改变当前工作流程。
向PICU进行机构间患者转运的转诊沟通主要通过转诊临床医生与PICU医生之间非结构化的口头交接进行。PICU负责人确定了标准化机构间转诊沟通的若干潜在益处和挑战。