Adelhelm Josefine Bak H, Larsen Trine Rennebod, Jakobsen Ulla, Vinholt Pernille J, Sandberg Maria Boysen, Hansen Inger Marie Jensen, Just Søren Andreas
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2025 Apr;85(2):108-115. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2025.2463087. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
Our study aimed to compare the quality of patient self-collected capillary samples with venous blood samples. Additionally, we assessed whether patients with rheumatic disease are both capable of and willing to perform capillary self-sampling through subjective and objective assessments. This research explores the future potential of at-home self-sampling. Patients with rheumatic diseases were asked to perform up to four supervised self-collected capillary blood samples, followed by a standard venous sample performed by study personnel. Anti-rheumatic drug treatment monitoring parameters, including biochemistry and hematology, were analyzed using Cobas 8000 and Sysmex XN-9000, respectively. The agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots and compared to critical difference limits. Study personnel and patients answered a survey questionnaire after every visit to evaluate feasibility. In total, 21 patients completed 53 paired capillary and venous samples from November 2019 to December 2020. We found a strong correlation ( > 0.87) and good agreement for most parameters; platelets showed the poorest agreement. Patients experienced little pain, found self-sampling easy and reported no serious complications. Hemolysis affected 12/53 capillary biochemistry samples, and 5/53 capillary hematology samples coagulated. The good agreement for most parameters and excellent feasibility encourages the potential for capillary self-sampling of DMARD monitoring parameters, relevant limitations were hemolysis and aggregating platelets.