Suppr超能文献

心血管疾病患者的姑息治疗:心脏病专家的转诊动机与流动姑息治疗团队实际提供的护理之比较

Palliative care for cardiovascular patients: comparison of the motives of referral by cardiologists and the actual care provided by the mobile palliative care team.

作者信息

Giffard Mathilde, Van Bulck Liesbet, Sall Fatimata Seydou, Becoulet Nicolas, Seronde Marie-France, Ecarnot Fiona

机构信息

Mobile Palliative Care Team, University Hospital Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.

Inserm CIC1431, University Hospital Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Apr;16(2):721-726. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01143-2. Epub 2025 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care for cardiovascular patients remains suboptimal, with few referrals to palliative care, often late in the disease. We investigated why cardiologists request palliative care and described the palliative care team's responses.

METHODS

This retrospective study included cardiovascular patients referred to the mobile palliative care team of a French University Hospital from 2010 to 2020 and compared cardiologists' referral motives with the care provided by the palliative care team.

RESULTS

Among 142 patients, almost half (47%) were women. The mean age at the time of death was 76 ± 14 years. For the 142 patients, 29.6% of referrals were unspecific, 24.6% involved ethical dilemmas, and 16.2% focused on symptom management. Conversely, the palliative care team addressed ethical dilemmas in 48.6% and symptom management in 19.7%, revealing a 56% mismatch between requests and interventions delivered.

CONCLUSION

Cardiologists often lack specific motives when referring patients to palliative care and may be unaware of ethical issues in cardiology care, highlighting need to raise awareness among cardiologists about ethical issues and palliative care services.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病患者的姑息治疗仍未达到最佳状态,转介至姑息治疗的患者较少,且往往在疾病晚期才进行转介。我们调查了心脏病专家请求提供姑息治疗的原因,并描述了姑息治疗团队的应对措施。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2020年期间转介至法国一家大学医院流动姑息治疗团队的心血管疾病患者,并将心脏病专家的转介动机与姑息治疗团队提供的护理进行了比较。

结果

在142名患者中,近一半(47%)为女性。死亡时的平均年龄为76±14岁。对于这142名患者,29.6%的转介原因不明确,24.6%涉及伦理困境,16.2%侧重于症状管理。相反,姑息治疗团队处理了48.6%的伦理困境和19.7%的症状管理问题,这表明请求与所提供的干预措施之间存在56%的不匹配。

结论

心脏病专家在将患者转介至姑息治疗时往往缺乏明确的动机,可能未意识到心脏病护理中的伦理问题,这凸显了提高心脏病专家对伦理问题和姑息治疗服务认识的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验