Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 26;80(4):332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.057.
Patients with advanced heart failure have substantial supportive care needs. Specialist palliative care can be beneficial, but it is unclear who is most appropriate for referral and when patients should be referred.
We conducted a Delphi study of international experts to identify consensus referral criteria for specialist palliative care for patients with advanced heart failure.
Clinicians from 5 continents with expertise in the integration of cardiology and palliative care were asked to rate 34 disease-based, 24 needs-based, and 9 time-based criteria over 3 rounds. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement. A criterion was coded as major if the experts endorsed that meeting that criterion alone was adequate to justify a referral.
The response rate was 44 of 46 (96%), 41 of 46 (89%), and 43 of 46 (93%) in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. Panelists reached consensus on 25 major criteria for specialist palliative care referral. The 25 major criteria were categorized under 6 topics, including "advanced/refractory heart failure, comorbidities, and complications" (eg, cardiac cachexia, cardiorenal syndrome) (n = 8), "advanced heart failure therapies" (eg, chronic inotropes, precardiac transplant) (n = 4), "hospital utilization" (eg, emergency room visits, hospitalization) (n = 2), "prognostic estimate" (n = 1), "symptom burden/distress" (eg, severe physical/emotional/spiritual distress) (n = 6), and "decision making/social support" (eg, goals-of-care discussions) (n = 4). The majority (68%) of major criteria had ≥90% agreement.
International experts reached consensus on a large number of criteria for referral to specialist palliative care. With further validation, these criteria may be useful for standardizing palliative care access in the inpatient and/or outpatient settings.
患有晚期心力衰竭的患者有大量的支持性护理需求。专科姑息治疗可能会有帮助,但尚不清楚谁最适合转诊以及何时应转诊。
我们对国际专家进行了一项德尔菲研究,以确定为晚期心力衰竭患者转介专科姑息治疗的共识转诊标准。
来自 5 大洲的心脏病学和姑息治疗专业知识的临床医生被要求在 3 轮中对 34 种基于疾病的、24 种基于需求的和 9 种基于时间的标准进行评分。共识预先定义为≥70%的一致。如果专家认为满足该标准本身就足以证明转诊合理,则将该标准编码为主要标准。
在第一轮、第二轮和第三轮中,回复率分别为 46 名中的 44 名(96%)、46 名中的 41 名(89%)和 46 名中的 43 名(93%)。专家组就 25 项专科姑息治疗转介的主要标准达成共识。这 25 项主要标准分为 6 个主题,包括“晚期/难治性心力衰竭、合并症和并发症”(如心脏恶病质、心肾综合征)(n=8)、“晚期心力衰竭治疗”(如慢性正性肌力药、心脏移植前)(n=4)、“医院利用”(如急诊就诊、住院)(n=2)、“预后估计”(n=1)、“症状负担/痛苦”(如严重的身体/情绪/精神痛苦)(n=6)和“决策/社会支持”(如目标关怀讨论)(n=4)。大多数(68%)主要标准的一致率≥90%。
国际专家就转介至专科姑息治疗的大量标准达成共识。经过进一步验证,这些标准可能有助于在住院和/或门诊环境中规范姑息治疗的获得。